Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill amends Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to expand the statutory definition of “corporation” to explicitly include hospital organizations and cooperative hospital service organizations described in IRC section 501(c)(3). In short, it makes certain tax‑exempt nonprofit hospitals subject to the FTC’s authority for purposes of antitrust and unfair competition enforcement.
Progressives emphasize consumer protection and antitrust enforcement benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, targeted statutory amendment that clearly effects the legal change of bringing specified tax‑exempt hospital organizations within the FTC's statutory definition of 'corporation.' It identifies the statutory provision to be amended and the category of entities to be included.
The bill amends Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to expand the statutory definition of “corporation” to explicitly include hospital organizations and cooperative hospital service organizations described in IRC section 501(c)(3).
In short, it makes certain tax‑exempt nonprofit hospitals subject to the FTC’s authority for purposes of antitrust and unfair competition enforcement.
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward which helps, but strong industry resistance and no compromise features reduce standalone prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, targeted statutory amendment that clearly effects the legal change of bringing specified tax‑exempt hospital organizations within the FTC's statutory definition of 'corporation.' It identifies the statutory provision to be amended and the category of entities to be included.
Progressives emphasize consumer protection and antitrust enforcement benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize consumer protection and antitrust enforcement benefits
Likely supportive because the bill closes a jurisdictional gap allowing the FTC to police nonprofit hospitals' anticompetitive behavior.
They would view this as a tool to restrain large hospital system monopolies that drive up prices and reduce patient choice.
Cautiously favorable to clarifying FTC jurisdiction, seeing it as a reasonable step to address market concentration.
They will seek safeguards, phased implementation, and careful cost-benefit analysis to avoid undermining access in fragile markets.
Likely opposed or skeptical, viewing the bill as federal overreach that expands FTC power into nonprofits and could interfere with hospital missions.
They will emphasize state authority, market solutions, and potential negative effects on charitable health providers.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward which helps, but strong industry resistance and no compromise features reduce standalone prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize consumer protection and antitrust enforcement benefits
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward which helps, but strong industry resistance and no compromise features reduce standa…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, targeted statutory amendment that clearly effects the legal change of bringing specified tax‑exempt hospital organizations within the FTC's statutory de…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.