H.R. 3024 (119th)Bill Overview

Stamp Out Invasive Species Act

Environmental Protection|Environmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined b…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Creates a two-year semipostal stamp called the Combating Invasive Species Semipostal Stamp.

The USPS must issue the stamp within 12 months of enactment; the postage differential may not exceed 25 percent.

Proceeds, as defined by Title 39 §416, are transferred equally to the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture at least twice yearly to fund programs that combat invasive species.

Passage50/100

Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, improving odds; however many standalone non‑controversial bills still stall, creating moderate uncertainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a limited substantive funding mechanism (a semipostal) and supplies the main operational parameters (authority reference, rate cap, duration, recipient split, payment frequency). It is concise and narrowly scoped.

Contention25/100

Scale: left sees symbolic but useful; right/center note funds likely small.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesGenerates dedicated, voluntary funding for federal invasive species prevention and control programs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase public awareness and engagement about invasive species through visible fundraising.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides a non‑appropriations funding stream that can augment DOI and USDA activities.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersRevenue outcomes are highly uncertain because total stamp sales are unpredictable.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAdministrative and implementation costs for USPS and recipient agencies could reduce net proceeds.
  • Targeted stakeholdersTwo‑year duration limits long‑term program planning and sustained invasive species efforts.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scale: left sees symbolic but useful; right/center note funds likely small.
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because it directs new voluntary funds to conservation and invasive-species control, consistent with environmental protection priorities.

May worry the measure is modest and could be symbolic rather than a substitute for robust appropriations.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Viewed as a modest, pragmatic tool to raise voluntary funds for a broadly supported problem.

Sees low fiscal risk but questions about actual revenue and program eligibility details.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Generally favorable to a voluntary, market-style fundraising tool that helps agriculture and ecosystems.

Cautions about federal program expansion and potential misuse of funds by agencies.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, improving odds; however many standalone non‑controversial bills still stall, creating moderate uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Expected revenue from sales is unspecified
  • Which specific DOI/USDA programs qualify is not detailed
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scale: left sees symbolic but useful; right/center note funds likely small.

Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, improving odds; however many standalone non‑controversial bills still stall, creati…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a limited substantive funding mechanism (a semipostal) and supplies the main operational parameters (authority reference, rate cap, duration, recipien…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis