H.R. 3025 (119th)Bill Overview

Expanding Access to Fertility Care for Servicemembers and Dependents Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends title 10 to require TRICARE to cover assisted reproductive services for active‑service members (including reserve components performing active service) and their dependents. Coverage must be provided regardless of service‑connection, prior fertility, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or marital status.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes equity and inclusive access; right emphasizes cost and scope limits.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory entitlement expanding TRICARE coverage to include defined assisted reproductive services for active servicemembers and dependents and removes certain prior eligibility restrictions.

This bill amends title 10 to require TRICARE to cover assisted reproductive services for active‑service members (including reserve components performing active service) and their dependents.

Coverage must be provided regardless of service‑connection, prior fertility, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or marital status.

The bill defines an "appropriate period" for trying to conceive and lists covered services: insemination, in‑vitro fertilization, cryopreservation of gametes or embryos, and other services the Secretary deems appropriate.

Passage40/100

Modest, service-member focused expansion improves prospects, but new spending and reproductive policy sensitivities reduce overall probability.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory entitlement expanding TRICARE coverage to include defined assisted reproductive services for active servicemembers and dependents and removes certain prior eligibility restrictions. The legislative text is concise and effective at creating the substantive change but provides limited operational detail, no fiscal provisions, and no accountability or evaluation mechanisms.

Contention65/100

Left emphasizes equity and inclusive access; right emphasizes cost and scope limits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands access to fertility treatments for servicemembers and dependents regardless of marital or gender status.
  • Potential benefitEstablishes explicit nondiscrimination protections for sexual orientation, gender, and marital status in fertility cove…
  • Potential benefitReduces expected out‑of‑pocket costs for eligible beneficiaries needing assisted reproductive services.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRaises federal health care spending and TRICARE program costs to cover fertility services.
  • Potential burdenCould strain military medical infrastructure and contracted civilian provider networks in some regions.
  • Potential burdenRequires administrative and regulatory updates to TRICARE benefit design and contractor operations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes equity and inclusive access; right emphasizes cost and scope limits.
Progressive95%

Strongly supportive.

The bill expands equitable access to fertility care for servicemembers and dependents, including LGBTQ+ and single people.

It removes medically irrelevant barriers and covers preservation important for cancer or deployment-related fertility risk.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The expansion addresses clear needs for servicemembers while raising predictable fiscal and implementation questions.

Support likely if costs, provider capacity, and program integrity are addressed.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical.

While sympathetic to supporting military families, this expands federal benefits and reproductive services in ways raising fiscal and conscience concerns.

Support limited unless scope and costs are constrained.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Modest, service-member focused expansion improves prospects, but new spending and reproductive policy sensitivities reduce overall probability.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or offset identified in the bill text
  • Projected utilization and total program cost unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes equity and inclusive access; right emphasizes cost and scope limits.

Modest, service-member focused expansion improves prospects, but new spending and reproductive policy sensitivities reduce overall probabil…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory entitlement expanding TRICARE coverage to include defined assisted reproductive services for active servicemembers and dependents and re…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis