Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
The bill requires reinstatement with backpay for individuals involuntarily removed from CISA between January 25 and March 1, 2025, unless removed for political appointment, misconduct, or unacceptable performance. It bars involuntary removals or transfers out of CISA and prevents impoundment, transfer, or reprogramming of CISA appropriations unless Congress explicitly authorizes such actions.
Liberal stresses civil-service protections; conservatives stress executive authority limits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes concrete substantive obligations and prohibitions affecting CISA personnel and allowable uses of Federal funds and includes several statutory cross-references and limited exceptions.
The bill requires reinstatement with backpay for individuals involuntarily removed from CISA between January 25 and March 1, 2025, unless removed for political appointment, misconduct, or unacceptable performance.
It bars involuntary removals or transfers out of CISA and prevents impoundment, transfer, or reprogramming of CISA appropriations unless Congress explicitly authorizes such actions.
The bill defines covered political positions and exempts them from these protections.
Narrow, implementable changes increase viability, but restrictions on executive authority and an unusual interagency ban reduce prospects, especially in the Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes concrete substantive obligations and prohibitions affecting CISA personnel and allowable uses of Federal funds and includes several statutory cross-references and limited exceptions. Its primary legal effects are specified, but implementation, fiscal, and accountability details are sparse.
Liberal stresses civil-service protections; conservatives stress executive authority limits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal stresses civil-service protections; conservatives stress executive authority limits.
Likely supportive: views the bill as restoring due process and protecting career civil servants from politicized removals.
Sees the limitation on transfers and appropriations as a defense against executive or partisan interference in a key cybersecurity agency.
Cautiously favorable but concerned about tradeoffs: values protecting career staff yet worries about operational flexibility, costs, and constitutional questions.
Wants targeted fixes, fiscal clarity, and precise statutory language.
Likely opposed: sees the bill as an encroachment on executive authority and agency management.
Concerned it restricts the ability to remove underperforming staff and could hinder CISA's responsiveness.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, implementable changes increase viability, but restrictions on executive authority and an unusual interagency ban reduce prospects, especially in the Senate.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal stresses civil-service protections; conservatives stress executive authority limits.
Narrow, implementable changes increase viability, but restrictions on executive authority and an unusual interagency ban reduce prospects,…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes concrete substantive obligations and prohibitions affecting CISA personnel and allowable uses of Federal funds and includes several statutory cross-refere…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.