H.R. 3031 (119th)Bill Overview

Gold Star and Surviving Spouse Career Services Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityMilitary personnel and dependents
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §4103A to add “eligible persons” to the Disabled Veterans’ Outreach Program eligibility. "Eligible person" is defined to include spouses described in 38 U.S.C. §4101(5) and spouses of service members who died while serving. The amendments insert eligible spouses into existing subsections, making them eligible for career services.

Why people may split

Extent of fiscal impact and need for new appropriations

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a relatively straightforward statutory amendment to expand program eligibility.

This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §4103A to add “eligible persons” to the Disabled Veterans’ Outreach Program eligibility. "Eligible person" is defined to include spouses described in 38 U.S.C. §4101(5) and spouses of service members who died while serving.

The amendments insert eligible spouses into existing subsections, making them eligible for career services.

The text does not specify new funding, timing, or detailed implementation steps.

Passage80/100

Narrow, administrative improvement for veterans' families with limited cost and broad appeal increases chance of enactment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a relatively straightforward statutory amendment to expand program eligibility. It specifies the change and integrates it into existing statute, but it omits implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgment, and accountability mechanisms.

Contention18/100

Extent of fiscal impact and need for new appropriations

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedVeterans

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases access to career counseling, job placement, and training for Gold Star and surviving spouses.
  • Potential benefitCould raise employment rates and earnings among participating surviving spouses, reducing economic hardship.
  • Potential benefitMay lower reliance on unemployment and public-assistance benefits for eligible spouses.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenExpanding eligibility likely increases VA and program administrative costs absent specific appropriations.
  • VeteransProgram capacity could be strained, potentially slowing service delivery to currently covered veterans.
  • VeteransCould divert limited resources from disabled veterans' services without additional funding.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Extent of fiscal impact and need for new appropriations
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: expands federal career services to Gold Star and surviving spouses.

Views this as addressing economic harm to military families and advancing equity for bereaved spouses.

Would press for funding and tracking to ensure veterans' services are not degraded.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable as a narrowly targeted, bipartisan improvement for military families.

Sees benefits as modest and administrable if funded responsibly.

Wants clarity on cost, implementation, and safeguards to preserve veteran service quality.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Cautious but generally supportive because it aids military families and Gold Star spouses.

Concerns focus on expanding federal program eligibility to non-veterans and potential unfunded mandates.

Would prefer strict scope, fiscal offsets, or pilot implementation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Narrow, administrative improvement for veterans' families with limited cost and broad appeal increases chance of enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO/score provided in bill text
  • Potential requests for program funding to match larger caseload
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Extent of fiscal impact and need for new appropriations

Narrow, administrative improvement for veterans' families with limited cost and broad appeal increases chance of enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a relatively straightforward statutory amendment to expand program eligibility. It specifies the change and integrates it into existing statute, but it omits imple…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis