- Federal agenciesMay increase WIFIA program lending capacity by lowering perceived federal budget costs per loan.
- Local governmentsCould encourage more state and local investment in water infrastructure projects.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay accelerate project starts and construction, potentially creating short‑term construction jobs.
Restoring WIFIA Eligibility Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Amends the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act to specify budgetary treatment for WIFIA financial assistance.
If a non‑Federal eligible recipient uses non‑Federal dedicated repayment sources, that assistance is to be deemed non‑Federal and treated as a direct loan or loan guarantee under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990.
Narrow, technical infrastructure financing change improves WIFIA utility, but budgetary scoring implications create procedural and CBO scrutiny risk.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative amendment that clearly prescribes a specific change in budgetary treatment for certain WIFIA financial assistance. The operative text is concise and legally oriented, integrating into existing statutes by reference to the Federal Credit Reform Act.
Liberals focus on infrastructure delivery and community benefits.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesCould complicate federal oversight and accountability over projects using WIFIA funds.
- Federal agenciesMight incentivize riskier projects if federal budgetary burden appears smaller.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay affect fiscal metrics and policy decisions by altering how obligations are scored.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals focus on infrastructure delivery and community benefits.
Likely supportive because the change facilitates local water infrastructure financing and leverages non‑Federal revenue for projects.
Views it as a way to speed investment in drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater upgrades for communities.
Cautiously favorable if the provision expands financing without increasing net federal cost or undermining transparency.
Wants clear scoring, risk allocation, and safeguards against budgetary gimmicks.
Mixed to skeptical: may welcome reduced apparent federal budget exposure but distrusts continued federal credit programs and potential hidden liabilities.
Prefers state/local solutions without expanded federal role.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, technical infrastructure financing change improves WIFIA utility, but budgetary scoring implications create procedural and CBO scrutiny risk.
- No CBO score or cost estimate included
- How CBO/Treasury will interpret FCRA treatment change
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals focus on infrastructure delivery and community benefits.
Narrow, technical infrastructure financing change improves WIFIA utility, but budgetary scoring implications create procedural and CBO scru…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative amendment that clearly prescribes a specific change in budgetary treatment for certain WIFIA financial assistance. The operative text is c…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.