Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
The bill amends Title III of the Help America Vote Act to add a new section that forbids any State from conducting Federal elections using ranked choice voting (RCV) where voters rank candidates by preference. It includes conforming and clerical amendments and takes effect for elections in 2026 and after.
Voter choice and representation versus ballot simplicity and clarity
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory prohibition implemented by amending the Help America Vote Act.
The bill amends Title III of the Help America Vote Act to add a new section that forbids any State from conducting Federal elections using ranked choice voting (RCV) where voters rank candidates by preference.
It includes conforming and clerical amendments and takes effect for elections in 2026 and after.
Substantive federal preemption of state election methods with high controversy and weak compromise features reduces prospects absent strong majority control.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory prohibition implemented by amending the Help America Vote Act. It specifies the prohibited conduct, statutory placement, and an effective date, but omits fiscal analysis, detailed compliance procedures, and treatment of edge cases.
Voter choice and representation versus ballot simplicity and clarity
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Voter choice and representation versus ballot simplicity and clarity
Likely to oppose the bill as an unnecessary restriction on voting reform and voter choice.
Views RCV as a tool that can increase representation and reduce spoiler effects, so a federal ban is seen as harmful to electoral inclusion and innovation.
Mixed view: sympathetic to concerns about voter confusion and administrative burden, but wary of federal preemption without strong evidence.
Likely to seek empirical studies and safeguards rather than blanket prohibition.
Likely to support the bill as a protection of straightforward plurality elections and election integrity.
Sees RCV as confusing, prone to manipulation, and as undermining clear 'most votes' outcomes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive federal preemption of state election methods with high controversy and weak compromise features reduces prospects absent strong majority control.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Voter choice and representation versus ballot simplicity and clarity
Substantive federal preemption of state election methods with high controversy and weak compromise features reduces prospects absent strong…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory prohibition implemented by amending the Help America Vote Act. It specifies the prohibited conduct, statutory placement, an…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.