Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 132 acres, as shown on a specified map, for inclusion in Camp Nelson National Monument. It also amends existing law to rename "Camp Nelson Heritage National Monument" as "Camp Nelson National Monument," and treats existing references as references to the new name.
Liberals emphasize preservation and public benefits from expansion
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive change that (1) renames an existing unit of the National Park System and (2) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 132 acres depicted on a specified map for inclusion in the monument.
This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 132 acres, as shown on a specified map, for inclusion in Camp Nelson National Monument.
It also amends existing law to rename "Camp Nelson Heritage National Monument" as "Camp Nelson National Monument," and treats existing references as references to the new name.
Content is narrow and routine; history shows similar site-expansion bills often pass, though acquisition funding and any local opposition add uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive change that (1) renames an existing unit of the National Park System and (2) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 132 acres depicted on a specified map for inclusion in the monument. The statutory amendment and map citation are explicit, but operational, fiscal, procedural, and oversight details are limited or omitted.
Liberals emphasize preservation and public benefits from expansion
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize preservation and public benefits from expansion
Likely supportive because the bill expands protected land and clarifies the monument's name, aiding preservation and public interpretation.
Views expansion as a modest, targeted federal investment in historic and cultural resource protection.
Generally favorable but pragmatic.
Supports historic preservation and limited, voluntary land acquisition while wanting clarity on costs, administration, and local consultation.
Views renaming as minor administrative cleanup.
Skeptical overall.
Opposes further expansion of federal landholdings and prefers state or local control.
Concerned about precedent, costs, and potential restrictions on private property use, even though acquisition is discretionary.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and routine; history shows similar site-expansion bills often pass, though acquisition funding and any local opposition add uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize preservation and public benefits from expansion
Content is narrow and routine; history shows similar site-expansion bills often pass, though acquisition funding and any local opposition a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive change that (1) renames an existing unit of the National Park System and (2) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximatel…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.