- Potential benefitMakes noncitizens convicted of listed sexual offenses automatically removable under aggravated felony rules.
- Potential benefitReduces eligibility for cancellation of removal, adjustment, and other discretionary relief for convicted aliens.
- Potential benefitSupporters may say it enhances public safety by facilitating removal of convicted sexual offenders.
BE GONE Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill amends 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) to add “sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence” to the statutory list of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Its stated purpose is to treat those convictions as aggravated felonies so that noncitizens convicted of them can be more readily removed from the United States.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43).
The bill amends 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) to add “sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence” to the statutory list of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Its stated purpose is to treat those convictions as aggravated felonies so that noncitizens convicted of them can be more readily removed from the United States.
Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prospects are modest.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). The bill clearly states its objective and precisely identifies the statutory provision to be altered, but it omits definitional detail, transitional and implementation provisions, fiscal acknowledgment, and oversight mechanisms.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenMay lead to more deportations of lawful permanent residents and long-term noncitizen residents.
- Potential burdenCould reduce humanitarian protections for victims or asylum-seekers with qualifying convictions.
- Federal agenciesMay increase detention, removal processing, and related federal enforcement costs and resource needs.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.
Likely opposed overall.
Supports public safety but worries the amendment is broad, may remove due-process and relief options, and could disproportionately harm immigrant communities.
Cautiously mixed.
Accepts need to remove serious offenders but seeks clearer definitions, guardrails, and analysis of immigration consequences and costs before full support.
Likely strongly supportive.
Sees the bill as strengthening immigration enforcement and public safety by making removal of convicted sexual offenders quicker and clearer.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prospects are modest.
- Whether bill is made retroactive or applies prospectively only
- Administrative capacity and cost estimates absent from text
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.
Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prosp…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). The bill clearly states its objective and pr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.