H.R. 3064 (119th)Bill Overview

BE GONE Act

Immigration|Immigration
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) to add “sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence” to the statutory list of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Its stated purpose is to treat those convictions as aggravated felonies so that noncitizens convicted of them can be more readily removed from the United States.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43).

The bill amends 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) to add “sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence” to the statutory list of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Its stated purpose is to treat those convictions as aggravated felonies so that noncitizens convicted of them can be more readily removed from the United States.

Passage45/100

Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prospects are modest.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). The bill clearly states its objective and precisely identifies the statutory provision to be altered, but it omits definitional detail, transitional and implementation provisions, fiscal acknowledgment, and oversight mechanisms.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMakes noncitizens convicted of listed sexual offenses automatically removable under aggravated felony rules.
  • Potential benefitReduces eligibility for cancellation of removal, adjustment, and other discretionary relief for convicted aliens.
  • Potential benefitSupporters may say it enhances public safety by facilitating removal of convicted sexual offenders.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay lead to more deportations of lawful permanent residents and long-term noncitizen residents.
  • Potential burdenCould reduce humanitarian protections for victims or asylum-seekers with qualifying convictions.
  • Federal agenciesMay increase detention, removal processing, and related federal enforcement costs and resource needs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.
Progressive25%

Likely opposed overall.

Supports public safety but worries the amendment is broad, may remove due-process and relief options, and could disproportionately harm immigrant communities.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Cautiously mixed.

Accepts need to remove serious offenders but seeks clearer definitions, guardrails, and analysis of immigration consequences and costs before full support.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive.

Sees the bill as strengthening immigration enforcement and public safety by making removal of convicted sexual offenders quicker and clearer.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prospects are modest.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether bill is made retroactive or applies prospectively only
  • Administrative capacity and cost estimates absent from text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and family-separation risks.

Technically simple and punitive changes can pass the House but face greater Senate barriers and advocacy/legal challenges; standalone prosp…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is legally reachable by a direct textual amendment to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). The bill clearly states its objective and pr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis