H.R. 3157 (119th)Bill Overview

State Energy Accountability Act

Energy|Electric power generation and transmissionEnergy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 255.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act to require State regulatory authorities that implement an "intermittent energy policy" to conduct and publicly release a general evaluation of that policy's effects on bulk-power reliability, rates, and resource adequacy over a 10-year period. States must assess emergency performance, replacement of retired reliable generation with equivalently accredited capacity, and reliance on out-of-state reliable generation.

Why people may split

Progressive worries bill will impede clean-energy mandates.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear new statutory obligation on State regulatory authorities to evaluate and publicly report the reliability, resource adequacy, and rate impacts of specified 'intermittent energy policies,' and it integrates that obligation into existing law with precise definitions and deadlines.

Amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act to require State regulatory authorities that implement an "intermittent energy policy" to conduct and publicly release a general evaluation of that policy's effects on bulk-power reliability, rates, and resource adequacy over a 10-year period.

States must assess emergency performance, replacement of retired reliable generation with equivalently accredited capacity, and reliance on out-of-state reliable generation.

The bill defines "intermittent energy policy" and "reliable generation facility," sets one-year deadlines for determinations and public reports, and requires states to apply the standard regardless of prior proceedings.

Passage35/100

Narrow, administrative change raises fewer fiscal barriers but touches contested energy/state authority issues, limiting broad bipartisan support.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear new statutory obligation on State regulatory authorities to evaluate and publicly report the reliability, resource adequacy, and rate impacts of specified 'intermittent energy policies,' and it integrates that obligation into existing law with precise definitions and deadlines. The bill is moderately well-specified in scope and actors but provides limited procedural detail, no fiscal provisions, and minimal accountability or enforcement mechanisms.

Contention72/100

Progressive worries bill will impede clean-energy mandates.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StatesStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StatesIncreases transparency by requiring public evaluations of state intermittent energy policies and their reliability effe…
  • Potential benefitPromotes longer-term resource adequacy planning with a required ten-year reliability assessment.
  • Potential benefitAims to identify risks to grid performance during emergencies and extreme weather events.
Likely burdened
  • StatesCreates additional regulatory and compliance burden for state authorities and regulated utilities.
  • StatesMay constrain or delay state renewable procurement policies by treating many renewables as "not reliable."
  • Potential burdenCould shift investment toward fossil or long-duration dispatchable resources, potentially increasing emissions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive worries bill will impede clean-energy mandates.
Progressive20%

Likely views the bill skeptically as a policy that targets state clean-energy mandates by labeling non-dispatchable resources "intermittent" and forcing extra hurdles.

Sees transparency and reliability analysis as useful, but worries the requirement will be used to delay or roll back decarbonization, and may overvalue fossil or dispatchable resources unless storage and grid upgrades are counted.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Sees merits in requiring states to evaluate reliability, rates, and resource adequacy, but is cautious about potential procedural burdens and federal-state tension.

Would favor clear, standardized methodologies, reasonable timelines, and funding or guidance to prevent needless litigation or delays.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely views the bill positively as necessary oversight to ensure state energy mandates do not impair reliability or raise rates.

Values the definition of "reliable generation" and the requirement that states quantify out-of-state reliance and replacement capacity accreditation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow, administrative change raises fewer fiscal barriers but touches contested energy/state authority issues, limiting broad bipartisan support.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • How state regulators and governors will react
  • Potential legal challenges on federalism grounds
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive worries bill will impede clean-energy mandates.

Narrow, administrative change raises fewer fiscal barriers but touches contested energy/state authority issues, limiting broad bipartisan s…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear new statutory obligation on State regulatory authorities to evaluate and publicly report the reliability, resource adequacy, and rate impacts of s…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis