H.R. 3169 (119th)Bill Overview

SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2025

Commerce|Commerce
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Small Business, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill reauthorizes and updates the federal SBIR and STTR small business research programs, extending program authority and several pilot programs through 2030–2032. It phases up agency set-aside percentages for SBIR (to 7%) and STTR (to 1%), adds fellowship and outreach authorities, expands technical and business assistance, and improves commercialization/Phase III processes.

Why people may split

Disagreement over phased increases to SBIR/STTR set-asides and fiscal impact

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive reauthorization and modification of the SBIR and STTR statutory framework that is generally well‑constructed: it provides detailed amendment language, concrete programmatic mechanics, assignment of responsibilities, and robust reporting and oversight provisions.

This bill reauthorizes and updates the federal SBIR and STTR small business research programs, extending program authority and several pilot programs through 2030–2032.

It phases up agency set-aside percentages for SBIR (to 7%) and STTR (to 1%), adds fellowship and outreach authorities, expands technical and business assistance, and improves commercialization/Phase III processes.

The bill increases transparency about research subcontractors, creates agency Technology Commercialization Officials, codifies foreign-ownership safeguards for certain VC/PE-owned firms, and requires new reporting and evaluations.

Passage65/100

Focused reauthorization of an established, broadly supported program with administrative fixes and phased increases improves plausibility, though ownership rules and budget impacts raise negotiation points.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive reauthorization and modification of the SBIR and STTR statutory framework that is generally well‑constructed: it provides detailed amendment language, concrete programmatic mechanics, assignment of responsibilities, and robust reporting and oversight provisions.

Contention65/100

Disagreement over phased increases to SBIR/STTR set-asides and fiscal impact

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesStatutory set‑aside increases will direct a larger share of agency R&D budgets to small businesses.
  • Potential benefitExpanded technical assistance, fellowships, and I‑Corps options could strengthen commercialization and workforce develo…
  • Federal agenciesPhase III training and Technology Commercialization Officials may improve transition of SBIR/STTR innovations into fede…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenHigher set‑asides could reduce agencies' flexibility to fund other research and procurement priorities.
  • Potential burdenNew reporting, database updates, and commercialization metrics will increase administrative and compliance burdens on a…
  • Potential burdenEligibility limits for firms majority‑owned by VC/PE or linked to foreign entities may exclude otherwise qualified star…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Disagreement over phased increases to SBIR/STTR set-asides and fiscal impact
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive.

The bill increases federal support for small-business innovation, strengthens outreach to minority institutions, and funds fellowships and technical assistance.

It also improves transparency and commercialization pathways, which align with goals of inclusive economic opportunity.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The bill responsibly reauthorizes SBIR/STTR, boosts commercialization, and mandates transparency while adding safeguards.

Concerns focus on costs, administrative complexity, and ensuring pilots and new authorities are evaluated for effectiveness.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Cautious to skeptical overall.

Supports commercialization and national-security ownership safeguards, but opposes growing mandatory set-asides, expanded bureaucracy, and transfers of agency funds to the SBA.

Concerned about federal overreach and fiscal impacts.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Focused reauthorization of an established, broadly supported program with administrative fixes and phased increases improves plausibility, though ownership rules and budget impacts raise negotiation points.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or CBO score provided
  • Stakeholder reactions from venture-backed firms unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Disagreement over phased increases to SBIR/STTR set-asides and fiscal impact

Focused reauthorization of an established, broadly supported program with administrative fixes and phased increases improves plausibility,…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive reauthorization and modification of the SBIR and STTR statutory framework that is generally well‑constructed: it provides detailed amendment language…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis