H.R. 3187 (119th)Bill Overview

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a parcel of property of the Forest Service to Perry County, Arkansas, and for other purposes.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|ArkansasGeography and mapping
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 248.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a specific 0.81-acre Forest Service parcel in Perryville, Arkansas, to Perry County if the county requests it within 180 days.

The transfer would be by quitclaim deed, for no monetary consideration, subject to valid existing rights and a Secretary-controlled reversion if not used for public purposes.

Perry County must pay transfer costs including survey, environmental, and historic-preservation analyses.

Passage75/100

Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent procedural obstacles.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped conveyance statute that is generally well‑constructed: it identifies the parcel, specifies the requesting party and timeframe to request, defines key conveyance terms, assigns costs to the recipient, and includes a reversion remedy and references to relevant statutes (CERCLA/NHPA).

Contention25/100

Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Counties
Likely helped
  • Local governmentsTransfers local control allowing Perry County to use the parcel for education and youth development programs.
  • Local governmentsMay enable local capital improvements and maintenance funded by county or local partners.
  • Federal agenciesEliminates ongoing federal management responsibility and associated administrative costs for the small parcel.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesConveys federal land without monetary consideration, reducing federal property assets and potential revenue.
  • CountiesQuitclaim deed and no CERCLA warranty may shift environmental liability risks to the county.
  • Local governmentsCounty must bear survey, environmental, and historic compliance costs, increasing local fiscal burden.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.
Progressive70%

Generally supportive of transferring underused federal property for public, community-focused purposes, but cautious about environmental and equity protections.

Concerns center on the lack of CERCLA warranty, quitclaim deed language, and ensuring the site actually serves local public needs.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Pragmatic approval likely: small parcel, local government pays costs, and reversion protects federal interest.

Wants clear environmental and legal steps to minimize downstream costs and ambiguity.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Favorable: supports shrinking federal footprint and empowering local governments to use property for public services.

Views county-paid costs and quitclaim conveyance as appropriate limits on federal responsibility.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood75/100

Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent procedural obstacles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate included
  • Unknown environmental or contamination history of parcel
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.

Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent proce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped conveyance statute that is generally well‑constructed: it identifies the parcel, specifies the requesting party and timeframe to request, defines…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis