Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill authorizes one additional United States district judgeship for the District of Idaho. The President would appoint the new judge with Senate advice and consent.
Progressives emphasize access to justice and backlog relief.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly accomplishes the primary substantive task of authorizing one additional district judgeship for the District of Idaho and conforming the statutory judgeship table.
This bill authorizes one additional United States district judgeship for the District of Idaho.
The President would appoint the new judge with Senate advice and consent.
It also amends the statutory table in 28 U.S.C. to show Idaho with three judgeships.
Small, low-cost judiciary staffing change that historically attracts bipartisan support; outcome depends on committee action and Senate scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly accomplishes the primary substantive task of authorizing one additional district judgeship for the District of Idaho and conforming the statutory judgeship table. It provides a concrete appointment mechanism and a direct amendment to 28 U.S.C. §133(a).
Progressives emphasize access to justice and backlog relief.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize access to justice and backlog relief.
Likely favorable; seen as expanding judicial capacity and improving access to timely court resolution.
Support is conditional on the new judge helping reduce backlogs and serve civil rights and public-interest cases.
Cautiously supportive if justified by demonstrated caseload need and reasonable budget.
Wants evidence that an additional judgeship will deliver efficiency and that costs are considered.
Mixed to somewhat skeptical; may accept if clear need exists but wary of expanding federal judiciary and associated costs.
Concerned about appointments and federal growth.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, low-cost judiciary staffing change that historically attracts bipartisan support; outcome depends on committee action and Senate scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize access to justice and backlog relief.
Small, low-cost judiciary staffing change that historically attracts bipartisan support; outcome depends on committee action and Senate sch…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly accomplishes the primary substantive task of authorizing one additional district judgeship for the District of Idaho and conforming the statutory…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.