Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Lacey Act to define “prohibited primate species” broadly (nonhuman primates and hybrids) and generally bans import, export, interstate commerce, breeding, and possession of those primates. It creates limited exceptions (transit, research facilities registered with USDA, and a narrow grandfathering for animals born before enactment subject to registration, no breeding, and no public contact).
Liberals emphasize animal welfare and zoonotic risk reductions
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear substantive amendment to the Lacey Act that sets out broad prohibitions on activities involving nonhuman primates and establishes a limited set of exceptions and an administrative timeline, but it exhibits drafting ambiguities and limited implementation and resourcing detail.
This bill amends the Lacey Act to define “prohibited primate species” broadly (nonhuman primates and hybrids) and generally bans import, export, interstate commerce, breeding, and possession of those primates.
It creates limited exceptions (transit, research facilities registered with USDA, and a narrow grandfathering for animals born before enactment subject to registration, no breeding, and no public contact).
The Secretary of the Interior must issue implementing regulations within 180 days, and enforceability does not depend on that rulemaking.
Substantive but narrow regulatory change with compromise features; plausible bipartisan support but common committee and floor hurdles lower enactment chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear substantive amendment to the Lacey Act that sets out broad prohibitions on activities involving nonhuman primates and establishes a limited set of exceptions and an administrative timeline, but it exhibits drafting ambiguities and limited implementation and resourcing detail.
Liberals emphasize animal welfare and zoonotic risk reductions
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize animal welfare and zoonotic risk reductions
Likely broadly supportive.
The bill restricts private ownership and interstate trade in nonhuman primates, aligning with animal welfare and public-health priorities.
Concerns would focus on adequate funding for enforcement and humane care for grandfathered animals.
Generally favorable but pragmatic; supports reducing risky private primate ownership while wanting clear implementation, cost estimates, and protections for legitimate facilities.
Would seek operational detail and phased enforcement to avoid unintended harm.
Skeptical overall.
Sees the measure as federal overreach that restricts private property and small businesses, imposes regulatory burdens, and could interfere with state authority and legitimate exhibitors or owners.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive but narrow regulatory change with compromise features; plausible bipartisan support but common committee and floor hurdles lower enactment chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize animal welfare and zoonotic risk reductions
Substantive but narrow regulatory change with compromise features; plausible bipartisan support but common committee and floor hurdles lowe…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear substantive amendment to the Lacey Act that sets out broad prohibitions on activities involving nonhuman primates and establishes a limited set of exceptio…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.