H.R. 3243 (119th)Bill Overview

Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025

Commerce|Commerce
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill prohibits commercial conversion therapy — paid practices or products that seek to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. It defines conversion therapy, carves out supportive or gender-transition assistance, and treats violations as unfair or deceptive acts enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, and the U.S. Attorney General under civil authorities of the FTC Act.

Why people may split

Protection of LGBTQ+ youth versus religious liberty and parental counseling

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive prohibition that provides clear findings and definitions, integrates explicitly with the Federal Trade Commission Act, and identifies federal and state enforcement mechanisms.

The bill prohibits commercial conversion therapy — paid practices or products that seek to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

It defines conversion therapy, carves out supportive or gender-transition assistance, and treats violations as unfair or deceptive acts enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, and the U.S. Attorney General under civil authorities of the FTC Act.

The statute emphasizes consumer protection and includes a First Amendment exception for protected products or services, with a severability clause.

Passage40/100

Clear, narrow consumer-protection approach improves viability, but subject matter is polarizing and would face substantial procedural and constitutional scrutiny.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive prohibition that provides clear findings and definitions, integrates explicitly with the Federal Trade Commission Act, and identifies federal and state enforcement mechanisms. It leaves some operational details to FTC rulemaking and existing statutes.

Contention65/100

Protection of LGBTQ+ youth versus religious liberty and parental counseling

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
ConsumersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • ConsumersReduces consumer fraud by banning paid practices that falsely claim to change sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • Potential benefitMay decrease mental health harms linked to conversion therapy, potentially lowering depression and suicide risk.
  • Potential benefitEnables FTC enforcement and civil remedies, increasing deterrence against deceptive therapy providers.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates potential federal-state tension by overlapping existing state regulation of health and licensing.
  • Potential burdenMay prompt substantial First Amendment litigation regarding religious counseling and expressive activities.
  • Potential burdenImposes compliance and litigation risks on small, faith-based, or private counseling providers receiving compensation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Protection of LGBTQ+ youth versus religious liberty and parental counseling
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: the bill aligns with public-health and civil-rights consensus that conversion therapy is harmful.

It treats the practice as consumer fraud and uses existing FTC civil enforcement mechanisms rather than criminal penalties.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive but cautious: the bill addresses clear consumer-harm concerns while relying on civil enforcement.

Centrists will watch for clarity on free-speech protections and federal reach into counseling.

Leans supportive
Conservative20%

Likely opposed: views the bill as federal overreach into private, religious, and parental counseling, expanding FTC regulatory power and risking free‑exercise and free‑speech conflicts.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Clear, narrow consumer-protection approach improves viability, but subject matter is polarizing and would face substantial procedural and constitutional scrutiny.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • First Amendment challenge scope and likely litigation outcomes
  • How FTC prioritizes and funds enforcement actions
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Protection of LGBTQ+ youth versus religious liberty and parental counseling

Clear, narrow consumer-protection approach improves viability, but subject matter is polarizing and would face substantial procedural and c…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive prohibition that provides clear findings and definitions, integrates explicitly with the Federal Trade Commission Act, and identifies…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis