Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Intelligence (Permanent Select), Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, Educati…
The bill, titled the American Privacy Restoration Act, would fully repeal the USA PATRIOT Act and restore any statutes amended by that Act to the text they had on October 25, 2001. In short, it removes all statutory authorities created or altered by the PATRIOT Act unless Congress enacts other changes.
Progressives emphasize civil-liberty restoration; conservatives emphasize national security risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill plainly and directly effects a substantive legal change by repealing the USA PATRIOT Act and directing statutory text be restored to its pre-2001 form.
The bill, titled the American Privacy Restoration Act, would fully repeal the USA PATRIOT Act and restore any statutes amended by that Act to the text they had on October 25, 2001.
In short, it removes all statutory authorities created or altered by the PATRIOT Act unless Congress enacts other changes.
A broad, controversial repeal of core counterterrorism authorities with no compromise features is unlikely to clear both chambers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill plainly and directly effects a substantive legal change by repealing the USA PATRIOT Act and directing statutory text be restored to its pre-2001 form. The primary mechanism is clearly stated in a single operative sentence, but the bill provides little else.
Progressives emphasize civil-liberty restoration; conservatives emphasize national security risks.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil-liberty restoration; conservatives emphasize national security risks.
Likely views the bill positively as a restoration of civil liberties and a rollback of broad surveillance authorities enacted after 9/11.
Supporters would frame repeal as returning statutory protections for privacy, due process, and limits on government intrusions.
Approaches the bill cautiously: supportive of addressing overbroad surveillance, but concerned about national-security and law-enforcement gaps.
Sees repeal as plausible only if accompanied by narrowly tailored, evidence-based replacements and transition safeguards.
Likely opposes wholesale repeal on national-security grounds, viewing the PATRIOT Act as essential for modern counterterrorism and law enforcement.
Argues Congress should improve oversight, not eliminate authorities used to prevent attacks and prosecute terrorists.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
A broad, controversial repeal of core counterterrorism authorities with no compromise features is unlikely to clear both chambers.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil-liberty restoration; conservatives emphasize national security risks.
A broad, controversial repeal of core counterterrorism authorities with no compromise features is unlikely to clear both chambers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill plainly and directly effects a substantive legal change by repealing the USA PATRIOT Act and directing statutory text be restored to its pre-2001 form. The primary me…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.