Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Amends the Social Security Act to require State IV‑E plans to prohibit federally assisted adoption or foster‑care entities from delaying or denying placements or discriminating against prospective or actual parents because they (1) raise a child consistent with the child’s sex, (2) decline consent to medical/psychological/surgical/pharmacological treatments intended to alter or validate a child’s perception of their sex when that perception is inconsistent with the child’s sex, or (3) decline consent to altering identity documents inconsistent with the child’s sex. The bill defines “sex,” “female,” and “male” in biological/reproductive terms, sets an effective date tied to the first fiscal quarter after enactment, and allows delay if state legislation is required.
Progressives emphasize harm to transgender youth and medical conflicts
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly sets a specific substantive prohibition by amending the State plan requirements in the Social Security Act and supplies definitional language and an effective date mechanism.
Amends the Social Security Act to require State IV‑E plans to prohibit federally assisted adoption or foster‑care entities from delaying or denying placements or discriminating against prospective or actual parents because they (1) raise a child consistent with the child’s sex, (2) decline consent to medical/psychological/surgical/pharmacological treatments intended to alter or validate a child’s perception of their sex when that perception is inconsistent with the child’s sex, or (3) decline consent to altering identity documents inconsistent with the child’s sex.
The bill defines “sex,” “female,” and “male” in biological/reproductive terms, sets an effective date tied to the first fiscal quarter after enactment, and allows delay if state legislation is required.
Short, targeted change but centered on a polarizing transgender/minor-care issue; more likely to face floor resistance and filtration in the Senate than routine technical bills.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly sets a specific substantive prohibition by amending the State plan requirements in the Social Security Act and supplies definitional language and an effective date mechanism. It integrates into the existing statutory framework but includes limited administrative detail and no fiscal or enforcement provisions.
Progressives emphasize harm to transgender youth and medical conflicts
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize harm to transgender youth and medical conflicts
Likely to oppose the bill as written.
It is viewed as singling out gender‑diverse youth and restricting access to gender‑affirming care and identity recognition, and potentially enabling discrimination by federally funded agencies.
Mixed reaction: supports avoiding arbitrary denials of willing foster/adoptive parents, but concerned about child welfare, medical standards, and legal conflicts between federal and state rules.
Likely to support the bill strongly.
It is seen as protecting parental rights, religious liberty of agencies, and preventing federal funds from conditioning placements on agreement to gender‑related treatments or ID changes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Short, targeted change but centered on a polarizing transgender/minor-care issue; more likely to face floor resistance and filtration in the Senate than routine technical bills.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize harm to transgender youth and medical conflicts
Short, targeted change but centered on a polarizing transgender/minor-care issue; more likely to face floor resistance and filtration in th…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly sets a specific substantive prohibition by amending the State plan requirements in the Social Security Act and supplies definitional language and an effective…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.