H.R. 3249 (119th)Bill Overview

Mom and Pop Tax Relief Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill replaces the existing Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction with a simplified, capped deduction equal to the lesser of a taxpayer’s combined QBI or $25,000. It removes the 20% multiplier and several complex limitation and carryover rules, phases down the deduction dollar-for-dollar above $200,000 AGI ($400,000 joint), tightens certain W–2 reporting and wage-allocation requirements, and takes effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize helping small businesses and limiting high-earner benefits.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that replaces the percentage-based qualified business income deduction with a capped-dollar approach and makes multiple conforming amendments.

The bill replaces the existing Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction with a simplified, capped deduction equal to the lesser of a taxpayer’s combined QBI or $25,000.

It removes the 20% multiplier and several complex limitation and carryover rules, phases down the deduction dollar-for-dollar above $200,000 AGI ($400,000 joint), tightens certain W–2 reporting and wage-allocation requirements, and takes effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

Passage40/100

Legislatively significant tax change with targeted appeal but unclear fiscal treatment and potential pushback from affected higher-income pass-through taxpayers and budget hawks.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that replaces the percentage-based qualified business income deduction with a capped-dollar approach and makes multiple conforming amendments. It specifies thresholds, modifies definitions (W–2 wages, taxable income rules), eliminates certain carryover provisions, and provides an effective date.

Contention63/100

Progressives emphasize helping small businesses and limiting high-earner benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides a fixed, predictable deduction benefit for small pass-through businesses and sole proprietors.
  • Potential benefitTargets relief to lower-income business owners with the $25,000 cap and AGI phaseout thresholds.
  • Potential benefitSimplifies the deduction formula by removing multiple complex subrules and loss carryover provisions.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRaises taxes on pass-through owners whose 20 percent QBI deduction currently exceeds the $25,000 cap.
  • Potential burdenEliminating loss carryover rules could hurt businesses that rely on carrying losses to offset future income.
  • Potential burdenThe 60-day SSA filing requirement for W–2 wages may impose additional administrative burdens and timing risks.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize helping small businesses and limiting high-earner benefits.
Progressive85%

Likely broadly favorable because the proposal targets relief to smaller "mom-and-pop" businesses, limits large pass-through tax benefits, and simplifies the code.

Would want assurances that low-income small businesses truly benefit and that the wealthy do not retain outsized benefits.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously supportive of simplifying and targeting relief to small businesses, while wanting clarity on budgetary cost and transitional effects.

Would seek a revenue estimate and might press for technical fixes to loss and wage rules.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Likely skeptical or opposed because it reduces the proportional deduction for many pass-through businesses, imposes an income phaseout, and represents a redistribution of tax benefits away from higher-earning small business owners.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Legislatively significant tax change with targeted appeal but unclear fiscal treatment and potential pushback from affected higher-income pass-through taxpayers and budget hawks.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official revenue score or CBO estimate provided
  • Net distributional impact among pass-through taxpayers unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize helping small businesses and limiting high-earner benefits.

Legislatively significant tax change with targeted appeal but unclear fiscal treatment and potential pushback from affected higher-income p…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that replaces the percentage-based qualified business income deduction with a capped-dollar approach and m…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis