Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill renames the peak currently identified as Frenchman Mountain at latitude 36°10′45″ N, longitude 114°59′52″ W in Nevada to "Maude Frazier Mountain." It directs that any United States law, map, regulation, document, record, or paper referencing that peak be treated as referring to Maude Frazier Mountain.
Federal action versus preference for state/local control
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming provision that clearly identifies the feature to be renamed and ensures existing federal references will be read to reflect the new name.
This bill renames the peak currently identified as Frenchman Mountain at latitude 36°10′45″ N, longitude 114°59′52″ W in Nevada to "Maude Frazier Mountain." It directs that any United States law, map, regulation, document, record, or paper referencing that peak be treated as referring to Maude Frazier Mountain.
Simple, low-cost renaming bills frequently become law, though procedural or local objections could delay action.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming provision that clearly identifies the feature to be renamed and ensures existing federal references will be read to reflect the new name.
Federal action versus preference for state/local control
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Federal action versus preference for state/local control
Likely supportive.
The bill symbolically honors an individual named Maude Frazier and updates official references.
Seen as a low-cost federal action that can advance representation and local heritage recognition.
Generally amenable if local stakeholders support it and costs are minimal.
Views it as a narrow, administrative federal action that should respect state and local preferences.
Skeptical.
Questions federal involvement in local geographic naming and potential precedent for federally driven renaming.
Prefers state or local control and minimal federal action.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Simple, low-cost renaming bills frequently become law, though procedural or local objections could delay action.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Federal action versus preference for state/local control
Simple, low-cost renaming bills frequently become law, though procedural or local objections could delay action.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming provision that clearly identifies the feature to be renamed and ensures existing federal references will be read to reflect…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.