H.R. 3288 (119th)Bill Overview

Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to define "prescription digital therapeutics" (PDTs) and require coverage under Medicare (Part B) and Medicaid beginning January 1, 2026. It directs HHS to create a Medicare payment methodology within one year, establish HCPCS coding (with temporary codes) within two years, and mandates annual manufacturer reporting of private-payor payment rates, volumes, and user counts, with civil monetary penalties for misreporting.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, and stronger price/privacy safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is well-structured in statutory amendments and definitions and provides concrete procedural deadlines and reporting requirements, but it relies heavily on delegated rulemaking for critical payment and operational details and omits fiscal and some operational specifics.

This bill amends Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to define "prescription digital therapeutics" (PDTs) and require coverage under Medicare (Part B) and Medicaid beginning January 1, 2026.

It directs HHS to create a Medicare payment methodology within one year, establish HCPCS coding (with temporary codes) within two years, and mandates annual manufacturer reporting of private-payor payment rates, volumes, and user counts, with civil monetary penalties for misreporting.

Medicaid coverage of PDTs is added to the list of mandatory covered services.

Passage45/100

Technocratic, moderately scoped expansion with measurable fiscal effects; could pass as part of larger health package but faces cost and stakeholder negotiation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is well-structured in statutory amendments and definitions and provides concrete procedural deadlines and reporting requirements, but it relies heavily on delegated rulemaking for critical payment and operational details and omits fiscal and some operational specifics.

Contention65/100

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, and stronger price/privacy safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
ManufacturersFederal agencies · Manufacturers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands Medicare and Medicaid coverage for FDA-cleared, software-first digital therapeutics starting in 2026.
  • ManufacturersCreates clearer payment rules and HCPCS codes, reducing billing and reimbursement uncertainty for providers and manufac…
  • ManufacturersManufacturer reporting could increase price transparency across payors, potentially encouraging lower private payor pri…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesLikely increases federal Medicare and Medicaid spending by adding a new covered category of products.
  • ManufacturersImposes new administrative and compliance burdens on manufacturers to report detailed pricing, volume, and user data.
  • Potential burdenCreates potential privacy and confidentiality concerns from mandatory reporting of user counts and distribution volumes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, and stronger price/privacy safeguards
Progressive85%

Generally supportive because the bill expands access to evidence-based digital treatments and includes Medicaid.

Sees reporting and coding requirements as tools for transparency and equitable coverage.

Will be wary about pricing, patient privacy, and equitable access for low-income and rural patients without devices or broadband.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously favorable: it pragmatically creates reimbursement pathways and transparency for a growing category of therapies while leaving payment design to HHS.

Wants clarity on fiscal impact, administrative timelines, and how codes interact with existing services.

Prefers measured implementation and oversight to limit waste.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical: appreciates innovation but worried this mandates expanded entitlement spending and creates new regulatory and reporting burdens.

Concerned about federal expansion into medical coverage decisions and potential long-term cost growth without clear offsets or state flexibility.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, moderately scoped expansion with measurable fiscal effects; could pass as part of larger health package but faces cost and stakeholder negotiation.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or CBO score included
  • Private payor and manufacturer support unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, and stronger price/privacy safeguards

Technocratic, moderately scoped expansion with measurable fiscal effects; could pass as part of larger health package but faces cost and st…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is well-structured in statutory amendments and definitions and provides concrete procedural deadlines and reporting requirements,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis