H.R. 3315 (119th)Bill Overview

No Hezbollah In Our Hemisphere Act

International Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the State Department, working with other federal agencies, to assess whether any Latin American country, region, or jurisdiction qualifies as a "terrorist sanctuary" for Hezbollah or related foreign terrorist organizations, and report to Congress within 180 days. If a jurisdiction is designated a terrorist sanctuary, the President may impose visa and admission sanctions on government officials from that jurisdiction, including immediate revocation of existing visas, subject to limited exceptions, waivers, reporting, and termination provisions.

Why people may split

Progressives prioritize civil liberties and humanitarian safeguards.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantively drafted sanctions and immigration-control measure directed at jurisdictions in Latin America assessed to be 'terrorist sanctuaries.' It combines a required interagency assessment, statutory references to existing authorities for inadmissibility and visa revocation, waiver and reporting provisions, and a sunset.

The bill directs the State Department, working with other federal agencies, to assess whether any Latin American country, region, or jurisdiction qualifies as a "terrorist sanctuary" for Hezbollah or related foreign terrorist organizations, and report to Congress within 180 days.

If a jurisdiction is designated a terrorist sanctuary, the President may impose visa and admission sanctions on government officials from that jurisdiction, including immediate revocation of existing visas, subject to limited exceptions, waivers, reporting, and termination provisions.

The bill expresses Congress’s intent that the U.S. pressure Latin American governments to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, pursue multilateral measures (including FATF greylisting), and help strengthen local counterterrorism laws.

Passage40/100

Administrable, narrowly targeted anti‑terror tool with limited cost increases chances; diplomatic sensitivity and Senate procedures reduce overall odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantively drafted sanctions and immigration-control measure directed at jurisdictions in Latin America assessed to be 'terrorist sanctuaries.' It combines a required interagency assessment, statutory references to existing authorities for inadmissibility and visa revocation, waiver and reporting provisions, and a sunset.

Contention60/100

Progressives prioritize civil liberties and humanitarian safeguards.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay disrupt Hezbollah fundraising, recruitment, and smuggling networks in Latin America.
  • Potential benefitCreates leverage to pressure foreign governments to investigate and prosecute Hezbollah affiliates.
  • Potential benefitEnables targeted denial and revocation of U.S. visa access for complicit officials.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCould strain diplomatic relations, reducing cooperation on security, migration, and counternarcotics.
  • Potential burdenMay hinder law enforcement information-sharing if targeted governments disengage or retaliate.
  • Potential burdenRevoking visas broadly risks due process concerns and inconsistent application for affected individuals.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives prioritize civil liberties and humanitarian safeguards.
Progressive65%

Generally supportive of countering Hezbollah influence but wary of broad punitive measures that may harm civilians or enable profiling.

Concerned about due process for affected individuals, humanitarian consequences, and potential misuse against political opponents.

Would favor stronger multilateral engagement, transparency, and safeguards to protect migrants and civil liberties.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Cautiously supportive: sees value in targeted diplomatic and visa tools against terrorist sanctuaries, while wanting clear criteria, interagency oversight, and measured diplomacy.

Concerned about political and economic fallout in the region and practical enforceability.

Will favor amendments clarifying definitions, oversight, and mitigating unintended consequences.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive of assertive measures to disrupt Hezbollah and Iranian influence in the hemisphere.

Views visa bans and revocations as effective, low-cost pressure tools.

May prefer even stronger sanctions and broader designation authority, and will push for robust implementation without lenient waivers.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Administrable, narrowly targeted anti‑terror tool with limited cost increases chances; diplomatic sensitivity and Senate procedures reduce overall odds.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Whether interagency evidence supports designations
  • Diplomatic backlash from targeted Latin American governments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives prioritize civil liberties and humanitarian safeguards.

Administrable, narrowly targeted anti‑terror tool with limited cost increases chances; diplomatic sensitivity and Senate procedures reduce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantively drafted sanctions and immigration-control measure directed at jurisdictions in Latin America assessed to be 'terrorist sanctuaries.' It combines a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis