Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Secretary (FDA) to seek arrangements with foreign governments that have facilities registered to manufacture, process, pack, or hold shrimp for U.S. consumption. Within 180 days the Secretary must begin seeking arrangements; one year after enactment shrimp from countries that do not enter arrangements or whose food inspection systems are not equivalent may be refused admission as adulterated.
Progressives emphasize consumer safety, labor, and environmental improvements.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that clearly establishes a legal framework to restrict shrimp imports from countries lacking arrangements or equivalent inspection systems, integrates into existing statutory provisions, and imposes concrete deadlines and reporting duties.
The bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Secretary (FDA) to seek arrangements with foreign governments that have facilities registered to manufacture, process, pack, or hold shrimp for U.S. consumption.
Within 180 days the Secretary must begin seeking arrangements; one year after enactment shrimp from countries that do not enter arrangements or whose food inspection systems are not equivalent may be refused admission as adulterated.
Equivalence criteria focus on enforcement staffing and oversight of shrimp raising and transport, foreign governments must provide laws and information, and the Secretary must report annually to Congress on implementation.
Technocratic, narrow food‑safety bill improves prospects, but trade/legal risks, lack of funding, and Senate procedural hurdles reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that clearly establishes a legal framework to restrict shrimp imports from countries lacking arrangements or equivalent inspection systems, integrates into existing statutory provisions, and imposes concrete deadlines and reporting duties.
Progressives emphasize consumer safety, labor, and environmental improvements.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize consumer safety, labor, and environmental improvements.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill strengthens consumer protection and creates incentives for better aquaculture practices.
It could also pressure exporting countries to improve labor, environmental, and sanitary standards.
Concerns would focus on ensuring the FDA has resources and on offering technical assistance to affected developing-country exporters.
Generally favorable to clearer food-safety standards but cautious about costs, timelines, and disruption to supply.
Would want precise equivalence criteria, predictable procedures, and funding for FDA to avoid unintended trade or price impacts.
Concerned about legal and diplomatic friction if implementation is abrupt.
Skeptical about the bill as an expansion of federal regulatory power that could act as a trade barrier.
Views it as likely to increase costs for consumers and importers and to impose new administrative burdens.
Some conservatives might accept targeted food-safety measures if narrowly tailored and financed without expanding permanent bureaucracy.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow food‑safety bill improves prospects, but trade/legal risks, lack of funding, and Senate procedural hurdles reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize consumer safety, labor, and environmental improvements.
Technocratic, narrow food‑safety bill improves prospects, but trade/legal risks, lack of funding, and Senate procedural hurdles reduce prob…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that clearly establishes a legal framework to restrict shrimp imports from countries lacking ar…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.