H.R. 3335 (119th)Bill Overview

Children Don't Belong on Tobacco Farms Act

Labor and Employment|Labor and Employment
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to treat employment of persons under 18 in tobacco-related agriculture as oppressive child labor. It prohibits workers under 18 from having direct contact with tobacco plants or dried tobacco leaves and removes tobacco-related agriculture from the act's narrow agricultural exceptions.

Why people may split

Child safety emphasis vs federal intrusion and farm autonomy

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act that adds tobacco-related agricultural work involving 'direct contact' with tobacco plants or dried leaves to the list of occupations deemed oppressive child labor.

The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to treat employment of persons under 18 in tobacco-related agriculture as oppressive child labor.

It prohibits workers under 18 from having direct contact with tobacco plants or dried tobacco leaves and removes tobacco-related agriculture from the act's narrow agricultural exceptions.

Passage35/100

Technically simple and non‑fiscal, so plausible; sectoral industry and jurisdictional pushback and Senate procedure reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act that adds tobacco-related agricultural work involving 'direct contact' with tobacco plants or dried leaves to the list of occupations deemed oppressive child labor.

Contention65/100

Child safety emphasis vs federal intrusion and farm autonomy

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersWorkers · Families

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces youth exposure to nicotine and pesticide hazards from handling tobacco plants and dried leaves.
  • WorkersImproves child safety by removing hazardous tobacco farm tasks from under-18 workers.
  • WorkersEncourages farms to hire adult workers or invest in mechanization, creating adult job opportunities.
Likely burdened
  • WorkersIncreases labor costs for tobacco growers who must replace adolescent workers with adults.
  • FamiliesReduces supplemental income and work experience opportunities for teenagers on family farms.
  • Federal agenciesRaises compliance costs for employers and administrative enforcement demands on federal agencies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Child safety emphasis vs federal intrusion and farm autonomy
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive, viewing the bill as a targeted child-protection measure that closes a hazardous loophole in agricultural labor law.

Emphasizes health and safety for children and aligning agricultural rules with protections in other industries.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive of protecting minors, but cautious about implementation and unintended economic effects on small farms and seasonal labor markets.

Wants clear enforcement plans, data on impacts, and possible targeted support for affected farms and families.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Likely opposed or skeptical, seeing this as federal overreach into family farms and state labor traditions.

Concerned about economic burden on agricultural producers and loss of customary youth farm work opportunities.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Technically simple and non‑fiscal, so plausible; sectoral industry and jurisdictional pushback and Senate procedure reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Precise legal definition of "direct contact" and coverage scope
  • Enforcement resources and any unlisted cost estimates
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Child safety emphasis vs federal intrusion and farm autonomy

Technically simple and non‑fiscal, so plausible; sectoral industry and jurisdictional pushback and Senate procedure reduce likelihood.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act that adds tobacco-related agricultural work involving 'direct contact' with tobacco plants…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis