H.R. 3337 (119th)Bill Overview

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3344 11th Avenue in Evans, Colorado, as the "Deputy Samuel Kent Brownlee Post Office".

Government Operations and Politics|ColoradoCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill names the United States Postal Service facility at 3344 11th Avenue in Evans, Colorado, the "Deputy Samuel Kent Brownlee Post Office." It requires that any federal reference to that facility use the new name. The bill contains no additional policy or funding provisions.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize vetting honoree's civil-rights record

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming that clearly and specifically accomplishes its primary legal action (designating a named postal facility and updating references).

This bill names the United States Postal Service facility at 3344 11th Avenue in Evans, Colorado, the "Deputy Samuel Kent Brownlee Post Office." It requires that any federal reference to that facility use the new name.

The bill contains no additional policy or funding provisions.

Passage85/100

Very high likelihood based on narrow, apolitical nature and minimal cost; procedural scheduling is main barrier.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming that clearly and specifically accomplishes its primary legal action (designating a named postal facility and updating references). It contains the minimal necessary language to effect the name change but omits ancillary administrative and fiscal details that are often included in comparable naming measures.

Contention10/100

Progressives emphasize vetting honoree's civil-rights record

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsHonors and recognizes the named individual's service, reinforcing local historical memory.
  • Local governmentsGenerates modest local economic activity from a dedication ceremony and sign production contracts.
  • Federal agenciesMay increase community pride and constituent satisfaction with federal representation.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates small federal costs for signage, records updates, and potential dedication expenses.
  • Federal agenciesAdds incremental administrative workload updating federal databases, maps, and documents.
  • Potential burdenSets precedent encouraging many similar naming bills, cumulatively increasing congressional workload and costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize vetting honoree's civil-rights record
Progressive75%

Likely broadly neutral to somewhat supportive because it is a local, symbolic honoring of a public servant.

Concern would arise if Deputy Brownlee has a record of misconduct or positions at odds with civil rights, which the bill does not address.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Likely supportive: a straightforward, low-cost local naming with bipartisan sponsorship.

The centrist view sees little policy impact and values compromise and local recognition.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive because it honors law enforcement and local service while imposing negligible costs.

Conservatives will view this as appropriate local recognition and common practice.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Very high likelihood based on narrow, apolitical nature and minimal cost; procedural scheduling is main barrier.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Committee scheduling and prioritization
  • Whether Senate will take up as standalone or bundle
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize vetting honoree's civil-rights record

Very high likelihood based on narrow, apolitical nature and minimal cost; procedural scheduling is main barrier.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative naming that clearly and specifically accomplishes its primary legal action (designating a named postal facility and updating refere…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis