H.R. 3352 (119th)Bill Overview

HALOS Act of 2025

Finance and Financial Sector|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresBusiness investment and capital
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The HALOS Act directs the SEC to amend Regulation D within six months so that presentations or communications by or on behalf of an issuer at certain sponsored events do not count as general solicitation. Eligible events include those sponsored by governments, universities, nonprofits, angel investor groups, incubators/accelerators, venture forums, trade associations, and other SEC-defined entities, subject to sponsor and issuer conditions and limited permitted offering disclosures.

Why people may split

Progressives stress investor protection and fraud risk concerns

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a focused, legally specific directive to the SEC to amend Regulation D to exempt certain issuer presentations at defined events from the general solicitation prohibition, with explicit sponsor and issuer constraints and a short statutory deadline for rulemaking.

The HALOS Act directs the SEC to amend Regulation D within six months so that presentations or communications by or on behalf of an issuer at certain sponsored events do not count as general solicitation.

Eligible events include those sponsored by governments, universities, nonprofits, angel investor groups, incubators/accelerators, venture forums, trade associations, and other SEC-defined entities, subject to sponsor and issuer conditions and limited permitted offering disclosures.

The sponsor must meet conditions (no investment advice, limited fees, one-page risk disclosure, no brokerage compensation), events cannot advertise specific offerings, and attendance alone does not create a pre-existing substantive relationship for Rule 506(b).

Passage45/100

Technocratic, narrow mandate improves prospects, but regulatory pushback, Senate hurdles, and possible litigation reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a focused, legally specific directive to the SEC to amend Regulation D to exempt certain issuer presentations at defined events from the general solicitation prohibition, with explicit sponsor and issuer constraints and a short statutory deadline for rulemaking.

Contention35/100

Progressives stress investor protection and fraud risk concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay increase startups' access to accredited investors by allowing public presentations at qualified events.
  • Potential benefitCould reduce compliance costs and legal uncertainty for issuers using private offering exemptions.
  • Potential benefitMay expand deal flow and networking opportunities for angel investor groups and accelerators.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay increase investor protection risks if broader solicitations reach less sophisticated participants.
  • Potential burdenCould create enforcement and supervision challenges for the SEC monitoring event-based communications.
  • Potential burdenSponsors may face unclear liability boundaries despite restrictions, raising legal risk and compliance costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress investor protection and fraud risk concerns
Progressive60%

Cautious support with reservations.

The persona would welcome clearer pathways for early-stage fundraising and community-based investing, but worries about reduced investor protections and possible circumvention of registration rules.

Concern centers on fraud risk and adequate SEC enforcement and disclosure requirements.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Generally favorable, viewing the bill as a pragmatic clarification that reduces legal uncertainty for issuers and sponsors.

The persona values capital formation for startups while wanting the SEC to craft narrow, enforceable implementing rules and monitoring to limit abuse.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive.

The persona sees the bill as a targeted deregulatory step that frees startups and angel groups to convene capital without fear of general solicitation rules.

Emphasis is on promoting entrepreneurship and minimizing transactional friction with limited new compliance burdens.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, narrow mandate improves prospects, but regulatory pushback, Senate hurdles, and possible litigation reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • How the SEC will interpret and implement the statutory directions
  • Strength of opposition from investor-protection advocates
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress investor protection and fraud risk concerns

Technocratic, narrow mandate improves prospects, but regulatory pushback, Senate hurdles, and possible litigation reduce likelihood.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a focused, legally specific directive to the SEC to amend Regulation D to exempt certain issuer presentations at defined events from the general solicitation…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis