H.R. 3359 (119th)Bill Overview

Veterans’ Security and Pay Transparency Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit an annual report to House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees detailing compensation paid to Department police officers.

Reports must be disaggregated by VA facility and specified police and security positions and include salaries, availability pay, recruitment/retention bonuses, and other compensation.

The bill adds a new section to chapter 9 of title 38 and mandates the first report within six months of enactment.

Passage40/100

Content is narrow and technocratic which helps prospects, but many modest administrative bills still stall for procedural or scheduling reasons.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑scoped reporting requirement that clearly assigns responsibility, timing, recipients, and specific report elements, and it integrates cleanly into title 38.

Contention25/100

Liberals emphasize transparency as step toward pay equity and reforms

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases transparency for congressional oversight of VA police compensation across facilities.
  • Targeted stakeholdersHelps identify pay disparities across facilities and positions to guide corrective legislation.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides data to diagnose retention and recruitment problems tied to pay incentives.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates recurring administrative workload for VA to compile disaggregated compensation reports.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould impose additional costs for report preparation without specific appropriations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDetailed facility-level compensation data could raise privacy or operational security concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize transparency as step toward pay equity and reforms
Progressive85%

Likely supportive as a transparency and accountability measure for public-sector safety personnel.

Would view reporting as a first step toward addressing pay equity and resource gaps across VA facilities.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Likely views the bill as a modest, pragmatic oversight tool with limited cost and measurable outputs.

Sees it as a reasonable data-first approach before any legislative pay changes.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

May be cautiously supportive of transparency but wary about federal reporting mandates and any operational security implications.

Some conservatives might see it as acceptable oversight if costs and sensitivities are controlled.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Content is narrow and technocratic which helps prospects, but many modest administrative bills still stall for procedural or scheduling reasons.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Magnitude of VA administrative cost to compile data
  • Whether disaggregation raises privacy or labor-union objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize transparency as step toward pay equity and reforms

Content is narrow and technocratic which helps prospects, but many modest administrative bills still stall for procedural or scheduling rea…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑scoped reporting requirement that clearly assigns responsibility, timing, recipients, and specific report elements, and it integrates cleanly into title 38.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis