H.R. 3361 (119th)Bill Overview

Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Reauthorization Act of 2025

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Public Lands and Natural Resources
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) authority in the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize and update the program.

Key changes include new monitoring and staffing requirements, expanded eligible project types (cross-boundary work, wildland-urban interface, watershed/drinking water), authorization of innovative implementation mechanisms (conservation finance, good neighbor agreements), an increase of a statutory $4,000,000 figure to $8,000,000, and an apparent extension of the program authorization to 2034.

Several textual edits add conflict resolution/collaborative governance and standardized monitoring language.

Passage70/100

Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obstacles.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused authorization amendment that reauthorizes and modifies the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program through targeted statutory changes (eligibility criteria, monitoring, staffing plan, and funding/authorization period adjustments). Its construction is generally consistent with an authorization-level substantive policy change.

Contention30/100

Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase funding per project, enabling larger or more numerous restoration projects.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely creates additional forest management and restoration jobs through expanded project activity.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpands projects that protect watersheds and drinking water sources, improving water-supply resilience.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal spending obligations and long‑term fiscal commitments for the program.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpanded active management could increase timber removal or biomass use, affecting some habitats.
  • Federal agenciesGreater federal staffing and program involvement may create jurisdictional frictions with State or Tribal authorities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.
Progressive75%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill renews and strengthens collaborative restoration, monitoring, and watershed protections.

They will welcome cross-boundary and wildland-urban interface focus but be cautious about expanded financing mechanisms that could prioritize commercial interests.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally supportive but pragmatic; appreciates reauthorization, stronger monitoring, and broader project scope while wanting clear cost controls, measurable outcomes, and defined federal support roles.

Will look for stronger clarity on funding mechanics and oversight.

Split reaction
Conservative60%

Cautiously favorable toward active forest management, wildfire risk reduction, and use of good neighbor agreements.

Skeptical of expanded federal roles, new staffing, and higher statutory spending unless paired with safeguards, state/Tribal control, and private leverage.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obstacles.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate included in text
  • Committee priorities and legislative calendar timing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.

Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obst…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused authorization amendment that reauthorizes and modifies the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program through targeted statutory changes (eligibi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis