H.R. 3369 (119th)Bill Overview

Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Forests, forestry, treesLakes and rivers
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill designates about 126,554 acres of Forest Service land in Olympic National Forest as new wilderness (with ~5,346 acres as potential wilderness), expands several existing wilderness areas, and adds numerous river segments in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. It assigns administration to the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary of the Interior as appropriate, allows restoration and species-recovery projects consistent with Wild and Scenic Rivers law, requires updates to Forest management plans, withdraws designated lands from mining and similar uses (subject to valid existing rights), and preserves treaty and other existing rights.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize conservation and species recovery benefits.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑specified substantive policy change that precisely identifies lands and river segments to be designated, integrates with existing statutory frameworks, and assigns administrative responsibility and procedural steps for implementation.

The bill designates about 126,554 acres of Forest Service land in Olympic National Forest as new wilderness (with ~5,346 acres as potential wilderness), expands several existing wilderness areas, and adds numerous river segments in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

It assigns administration to the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary of the Interior as appropriate, allows restoration and species-recovery projects consistent with Wild and Scenic Rivers law, requires updates to Forest management plans, withdraws designated lands from mining and similar uses (subject to valid existing rights), and preserves treaty and other existing rights.

Passage40/100

Plausible if bundled into a larger public-lands package or if there is strong local consensus; standalone Senate passage is the main hurdle.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑specified substantive policy change that precisely identifies lands and river segments to be designated, integrates with existing statutory frameworks, and assigns administrative responsibility and procedural steps for implementation. It includes a number of targeted provisions to handle potential conflicts and exceptions.

Contention70/100

Liberals emphasize conservation and species recovery benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProtects watersheds and habitat for salmon and other species, aiding recovery and biodiversity.
  • Potential benefitDesignations withdraw lands from mining and leasing, preventing new mineral development in protected areas.
  • Potential benefitAuthorizes river restoration and endangered species recovery projects prioritized under Wild and Scenic provisions.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal lands available for timber harvest, potentially lowering logging-related employment and revenue.
  • Federal agenciesWithdrawal from leasing and mining could reduce potential federal and state mineral leasing receipts.
  • Potential burdenRequires Forest Service and Interior to update plans and manage new areas, increasing administrative costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize conservation and species recovery benefits.
Progressive90%

Overall supportive.

The bill permanently protects large forest and river ecosystems, expands wilderness, and enables river and species restoration.

It preserves treaty rights and allows necessary ecological restoration consistent with existing law.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

Recognizes conservation gains while noting potential local economic and access impacts.

Wants clear funding, implementation timelines, and protections for valid existing rights.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed.

Views federal wilderness and Wild and Scenic designations as restrictive federal land grabs that limit local use, economic activity, and state control despite 'existing rights' language.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Plausible if bundled into a larger public-lands package or if there is strong local consensus; standalone Senate passage is the main hurdle.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Strength of local congressional delegation support
  • Position of Washington State agencies and elected officials
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize conservation and species recovery benefits.

Plausible if bundled into a larger public-lands package or if there is strong local consensus; standalone Senate passage is the main hurdle.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑specified substantive policy change that precisely identifies lands and river segments to be designated, integrates with existing statutory frameworks, and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis