H.R. 3389 (119th)Bill Overview

Alzheimer’s Law Enforcement Education Act of 2025

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill requires the Director of the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) to create an online training course about Alzheimer’s disease and similar dementias within one year, developed in consultation with HHS and CMS. The course must cover interacting and communicating with affected persons, recognizing behavioral symptoms, alternatives to physical restraints, and detecting abuse, neglect, or exploitation.

Why people may split

Liberals want stronger funding and mandatory adoption; conservatives prefer voluntary approach

Watch point

Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill clearly assigns responsibility and scope for creating an online dementia-awareness training and lists specific content areas, but it omits key implementation supports.

This bill requires the Director of the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) to create an online training course about Alzheimer’s disease and similar dementias within one year, developed in consultation with HHS and CMS.

The course must cover interacting and communicating with affected persons, recognizing behavioral symptoms, alternatives to physical restraints, and detecting abuse, neglect, or exploitation.

The Director will recommend states allow course participation to count toward required training hours for law enforcement, correctional, or probation officers.

Passage65/100

Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively feasible, but lacks funding and depends on congressional floor time and state uptake.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill clearly assigns responsibility and scope for creating an online dementia-awareness training and lists specific content areas, but it omits key implementation supports.

Contention12/100

Liberals want stronger funding and mandatory adoption; conservatives prefer voluntary approach

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides a standardized, federally developed online curriculum for dementia-related law enforcement interactions.
  • Potential benefitImproves officers' ability to recognize dementia symptoms, potentially reducing misinterpretation of behaviors.
  • Potential benefitPromotes alternatives to physical restraints, potentially lowering use of force and related injuries.
Likely burdened
  • StatesUptake may be uneven because the bill only recommends state credit rather than requiring adoption.
  • Federal agenciesTime for officers to complete the training could strain agency schedules and operational staffing.
  • Potential burdenNo explicit funding is authorized, which may delay course development or limit quality.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want stronger funding and mandatory adoption; conservatives prefer voluntary approach
Progressive85%

Likely supportive because the bill promotes protections for a vulnerable population and seeks non-coercive alternatives to restraints.

They will welcome training that reduces harm and improves identification of abuse, while wanting stronger guarantees on implementation and access.

Leans supportive
Centrist92%

Generally favorable as a practical, narrow policy improving law enforcement interactions with people with dementia.

They will focus on implementation details, cost-effectiveness, and whether states will actually use the voluntary recommendation.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Leans supportive because it is a limited, non-mandatory federal initiative to improve public safety and protect seniors.

They may be cautious about federal expansion into training and want assurance this won’t become a costly mandate.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively feasible, but lacks funding and depends on congressional floor time and state uptake.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No appropriation or cost estimate included
  • DOJ COPS staffing and capacity to develop course
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want stronger funding and mandatory adoption; conservatives prefer voluntary approach

Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively feasible, but lacks funding and depends on congressional floor time and state upt…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill clearly assigns responsibility and scope for creating an online dementia-awareness training and lists specific content areas, but it omits key implemen…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis