H.R. 3393 (119th)Bill Overview

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 12208 North 19th Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the "Officer Zane T. Coolidge Post Office".

Government Operations and Politics|ArizonaCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 12208 North 19th Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the "Officer Zane T. Coolidge Post Office." It states that any reference to the facility shall use the new name.

Why people may split

Progressives worry about policing accountability implications

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-specified commemorative designation: it precisely identifies the facility and sets the official name, with an appropriate clause integrating the new name into references.

This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 12208 North 19th Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the "Officer Zane T.

Coolidge Post Office." It states that any reference to the facility shall use the new name.

The bill contains only the naming and reference provisions and no funding or programmatic changes.

Passage85/100

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial action historically successful; main risks are procedural, not substantive.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-specified commemorative designation: it precisely identifies the facility and sets the official name, with an appropriate clause integrating the new name into references.

Contention12/100

Progressives worry about policing accountability implications

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesFormally honors an individual and recognizes their service with a named federal facility.
  • CommunitiesProvides a tangible memorial site for the honoree's family and community.
  • Local governmentsCan boost local civic pride and public recognition of community service.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAllocates legislative time to a symbolic naming rather than substantive policy matters.
  • Federal agenciesCreates a small but nonzero federal expense for signage and administrative updates.
  • Potential burdenContributes to precedent for numerous similar naming bills, increasing administrative workload.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about policing accountability implications
Progressive70%

Likely broadly favorable to a local honorific but cautious.

Support depends on Officer Coolidge's record and whether naming appears to glorify problematic policing.

Without controversial facts, many progressives would view this as a low-priority local matter.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive as a routine, local naming with minimal policy impact.

Views it as standard congressional practice to honor local figures.

Would want reasonable vetting and constituent backing but sees little controversy absent specific allegations.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable; recognizes law enforcement service and supports honoring public safety officers.

Sees this as an appropriate, low-cost federal gesture.

Unlikely to view this as a substantive policy change or source of major controversy.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial action historically successful; main risks are procedural, not substantive.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will report bill promptly
  • Senate floor scheduling or individual senator holds
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about policing accountability implications

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial action historically successful; main risks are procedural, not substantive.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-specified commemorative designation: it precisely identifies the facility and sets the official name, with an appropriate clause integra…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis