H.R. 3396 (119th)Bill Overview

To redesignate Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park, and for other purposes.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Public Lands and Natural Resources
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill redesignates Gravelly Point Park on the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park. It also states that any federal reference to Gravelly Point Park will be considered a reference to the new name.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize politicization and community consultation concerns.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped commemorative redesignation that clearly names the park change and updates legal references, but provides minimal execution, fiscal, or oversight detail.

The bill redesignates Gravelly Point Park on the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park.

It also states that any federal reference to Gravelly Point Park will be considered a reference to the new name.

No other substantive policy changes are included in the text.

Passage70/100

Very narrow, symbolic change with minimal costs makes enactment likely absent local objections or procedural holds.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped commemorative redesignation that clearly names the park change and updates legal references, but provides minimal execution, fiscal, or oversight detail.

Contention55/100

Progressives emphasize politicization and community consultation concerns.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesHonors Nancy Reagan by establishing a federal memorial name for the park.
  • Potential benefitMay modestly increase visitation by people interested in the namesake.
  • Potential benefitClarifies legal and documentary consistency by directing references to the new name.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCosts to replace signage, brochures, and physical markers at the site.
  • Federal agenciesAdministrative effort required to update federal, state, and commercial databases and maps.
  • Local governmentsSome residents or stakeholders may object to replacing an established local place name.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize politicization and community consultation concerns.
Progressive35%

Likely sees the measure as largely symbolic and low priority compared with substantive social policy.

Some would object to honoring a conservative-era First Lady without broader community input, while others may accept it as harmless historical recognition.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Views the bill pragmatically: a small, administrative renaming that requires checking local sentiment and cost.

Support likely if local stakeholders approve and implementation costs are minimal.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive as a respectful honorific for a former First Lady and public figure.

Sees renaming as an appropriate, low-cost way to commemorate Nancy Reagan's legacy.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Very narrow, symbolic change with minimal costs makes enactment likely absent local objections or procedural holds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Local stakeholder attitudes in Arlington County
  • Any opposition from constituents preferring historical name
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize politicization and community consultation concerns.

Very narrow, symbolic change with minimal costs makes enactment likely absent local objections or procedural holds.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped commemorative redesignation that clearly names the park change and updates legal references, but provides minimal execution, fiscal, or oversight…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis