H.R. 3407 (119th)Bill Overview

Money Accounts for Growth and Advancement Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Creates a new tax-preferred custodial trust called a MAGA account (Money Account for Growth and Advancement) for children, allowing annual contributions (limit $5,000, COLA-adjusted) invested in low-fee U.S. equity index funds. Distributions for qualified expenses (higher education, post-secondary credentials, certain small business expenses, first-time home purchase) receive favorable capital-gains tax treatment; other distributions are taxable and penalized if taken early.

Why people may split

Privacy/data sharing: conservatives oppose Treasury disclosures; liberals seek protections.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-law change that is largely well-specified in statutory mechanics and integration with existing Internal Revenue Code provisions, but it relies on significant delegation to the Secretary for key definitions and omits fiscal and administrative resourcing detail.

Creates a new tax-preferred custodial trust called a MAGA account (Money Account for Growth and Advancement) for children, allowing annual contributions (limit $5,000, COLA-adjusted) invested in low-fee U.S. equity index funds.

Distributions for qualified expenses (higher education, post-secondary credentials, certain small business expenses, first-time home purchase) receive favorable capital-gains tax treatment; other distributions are taxable and penalized if taken early.

Accounts require SSNs, trustee oversight, reporting, and terminate at age 31 (treated as distribution).

Passage35/100

Substantive but narrow tax-advantaged account could attract bipartisan support; fiscal cost, privacy and citizenship limits reduce prospects.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-law change that is largely well-specified in statutory mechanics and integration with existing Internal Revenue Code provisions, but it relies on significant delegation to the Secretary for key definitions and omits fiscal and administrative resourcing detail.

Contention38/100

Privacy/data sharing: conservatives oppose Treasury disclosures; liberals seek protections.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Small businessesFederal agencies · Permitting process

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides an up-front $1,000 credit into newborns' MAGA accounts, increasing initial savings balances.
  • Small businessesCreates a dedicated tax-advantaged vehicle to finance education, first homes, and small business starts.
  • Potential benefitDirects investments toward low-fee, index-based U.S. equity funds, potentially lowering costs for account holders.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates federal tax revenue loss from newly tax-exempt accounts depending on uptake and balances.
  • Permitting processRequires SSNs and permits IRS disclosure to Treasury offices, raising privacy and data-sharing concerns.
  • Potential burdenImposes compliance, reporting, and withholding obligations on trustees, increasing administrative burdens and costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Privacy/data sharing: conservatives oppose Treasury disclosures; liberals seek protections.
Progressive70%

Generally supportive of tools that create asset-building for children and a small federal seed contribution.

Concerned about exclusions, regressivity, and privacy; wants safeguards for low-income families and noncitizen children.

Sees potential to expand education and homeownership access, but cautious about implementation details and limited contribution mechanics.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously positive about encouraging private savings for children and a modest federal pilot contribution, but wary of cost, overlap, and administrative complexity.

Wants clearer fiscal estimates, anti-duplication with 529/UTMA, and strong privacy protections.

Would support with tighter guardrails and a clear implementation plan.

Split reaction
Conservative75%

Generally favorable toward encouraging private, market-based savings for children and limiting investments to low-cost U.S. index funds.

Concerned about federal creation of default accounts, data-sharing requirements, and any ongoing federal contributions.

Prefers minimizing ongoing federal roles and ensuring parental control and low administrative cost.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Substantive but narrow tax-advantaged account could attract bipartisan support; fiscal cost, privacy and citizenship limits reduce prospects.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official budgetary/cost estimate included in text
  • Reactions to the bill's politically charged name
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Privacy/data sharing: conservatives oppose Treasury disclosures; liberals seek protections.

Substantive but narrow tax-advantaged account could attract bipartisan support; fiscal cost, privacy and citizenship limits reduce prospect…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-law change that is largely well-specified in statutory mechanics and integration with existing Internal Revenue Code provisions, but it relies on…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis