H.R. 3422 (119th)Bill Overview

Promoting Opportunities for Non-Traditional Capital Formation Act

Commerce|Business investment and capitalCommerce
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 15, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand duties of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation.

The Advocate must provide educational resources and host or participate in events promoting capital-raising options for underrepresented, rural, and disaster-affected small businesses.

The Advocate must also meet at least annually with State securities commissions to discuss collaboration.

Passage65/100

Narrow, administrative, low-cost change that commonly wins bipartisan support; procedural Senate hurdles and missing cost clarity reduce certainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted amendment that assigns additional outreach and collaboration duties to an existing statutory Advocate and integrates cleanly with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Contention55/100

Progressives stress equity and access benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases awareness of capital-raising options among women-, minority-, rural-, and disaster-affected businesses.
  • Federal agenciesMay improve coordination between federal and state securities regulators supporting small business capital efforts.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould facilitate more targeted technical assistance and investor education for underrepresented entrepreneurs.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersImposes additional administrative duties on the Advocate and SEC staff without providing funding.
  • StatesMay duplicate existing state or nonprofit outreach programs, creating potential overlap.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely produces modest measurable effects on actual capital raised absent broader policy or funding changes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress equity and access benefits
Progressive90%

Likely supportive: this directs federal outreach to historically underserved small businesses and promotes access to capital.

Views the changes as modest steps to reduce structural barriers, though outcomes depend on implementation and resources.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: sees low-cost federal outreach as useful, provided it avoids duplication and shows measurable benefits.

Concerned about unfunded mandates and wants reporting and coordination to minimize waste.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Skeptical to moderately opposed: views the bill as federal activism favoring particular demographic groups and potentially expanding bureaucracy.

Might accept limited outreach but worries about mission creep and identity-based priorities.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, administrative, low-cost change that commonly wins bipartisan support; procedural Senate hurdles and missing cost clarity reduce certainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No congressional cost estimate or budgetary offset provided
  • SEC resource capacity to implement added duties
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress equity and access benefits

Narrow, administrative, low-cost change that commonly wins bipartisan support; procedural Senate hurdles and missing cost clarity reduce ce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted amendment that assigns additional outreach and collaboration duties to an existing statutory Advocate and integrates cleanly with the Secu…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis