Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2153)
Creates an Office of Agritourism within the U.S. Department of Agriculture, led by a Director, to promote and coordinate agritourism activities nationwide. The Office will advise the Secretary, update USDA programs for best practices, provide outreach and technical assistance, facilitate interagency coordination, and review farm enterprise development programs.
Support for rural economic development vs concern over federal bureaucracy
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward administrative measure that clearly establishes an Office of Agritourism within the Department of Agriculture, defines a Director role, enumerates responsibilities, and integrates those changes into existing statutory text, but it leaves key operational elements (funding, timelines, staffing, and reporting/oversight) unspecified.
Creates an Office of Agritourism within the U.S. Department of Agriculture, led by a Director, to promote and coordinate agritourism activities nationwide.
The Office will advise the Secretary, update USDA programs for best practices, provide outreach and technical assistance, facilitate interagency coordination, and review farm enterprise development programs.
The bill also makes minor conforming and redesignation amendments to the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994.
Technical, narrow, and noncontroversial content favors enactment, but success depends on appropriation decisions and competition for floor time or inclusion in larger bills.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward administrative measure that clearly establishes an Office of Agritourism within the Department of Agriculture, defines a Director role, enumerates responsibilities, and integrates those changes into existing statutory text, but it leaves key operational elements (funding, timelines, staffing, and reporting/oversight) unspecified.
Support for rural economic development vs concern over federal bureaucracy
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support for rural economic development vs concern over federal bureaucracy
Likely supportive because the Office targets rural economic development, farm diversification, education, and preservation of agricultural heritage.
Would seek strong implementation that prioritizes small and family farms, equity for underserved rural communities, environmental stewardship, and worker protections.
Some impacts (funding levels, program design) are uncertain from the text.
Generally positive about a coordinated federal role to boost rural economies and provide technical assistance, while cautious about costs and duplication with state programs.
Will look for clear performance metrics, transparency, and limited scope to avoid waste.
Some implementation details, especially budget and intergovernmental coordination, are unclear in the text.
Skeptical of creating a new federal office; views it as an expansion of federal bureaucracy and potential intrusion on state and local control.
May accept agritourism promotion if limited, market-driven, state-led, and not funded by large new federal spending.
Some claimed benefits (tourism growth) are acknowledged but weighed against costs and scope creep.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technical, narrow, and noncontroversial content favors enactment, but success depends on appropriation decisions and competition for floor time or inclusion in larger bills.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support for rural economic development vs concern over federal bureaucracy
Technical, narrow, and noncontroversial content favors enactment, but success depends on appropriation decisions and competition for floor…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward administrative measure that clearly establishes an Office of Agritourism within the Department of Agriculture, defines a Director role, enumerate…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.