H.R. 350 (119th)Bill Overview

Prosecutors Need to Prosecute Act

Crime and Law Enforcement|Assault and harassment offensesCrime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to require district attorney and prosecutor offices serving jurisdictions of 380,000+ people that receive Byrne grant funds to annually report specified prosecution metrics to the Attorney General. Reported data include numbers of referrals, declinations, plea outcomes by charge, defendants' prior arrests/convictions/open cases/probation/parole status, and bail/release information for a defined set of "covered offenses." The Attorney General must create uniform reporting standards, submit aggregated data to House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and publish it on a public website. "Covered offenses" are enumerated and include homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, arson, and illegal firearm offenses.

Why people may split

Liberals worry reporting will coerce harsher prosecutions; conservatives see it as accountability.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped reporting mandate that is specific about what data to collect and who must report, but it provides limited implementation scaffolding (no funding, limited deadlines, no enforcement or data-validation provisions).

This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to require district attorney and prosecutor offices serving jurisdictions of 380,000+ people that receive Byrne grant funds to annually report specified prosecution metrics to the Attorney General.

Reported data include numbers of referrals, declinations, plea outcomes by charge, defendants' prior arrests/convictions/open cases/probation/parole status, and bail/release information for a defined set of "covered offenses." The Attorney General must create uniform reporting standards, submit aggregated data to House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and publish it on a public website. "Covered offenses" are enumerated and include homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, arson, and illegal firearm offenses.

Passage40/100

Low-cost, limited-scope reporting increases plausibility, but contentious subject and federalism concerns reduce chances, especially in the Senate.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped reporting mandate that is specific about what data to collect and who must report, but it provides limited implementation scaffolding (no funding, limited deadlines, no enforcement or data-validation provisions).

Contention55/100

Liberals worry reporting will coerce harsher prosecutions; conservatives see it as accountability.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates standardized prosecution data from large, Byrne-funded jurisdictions for analysis.
  • Federal agenciesEnables federal oversight and potential accountability tied to federal grant programs.
  • Potential benefitImproves research and policy design with detailed plea, bail, and recidivism statistics.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes administrative, staffing, and IT costs on prosecutor offices to compile reports.
  • Local governmentsCould intrude on local prosecutorial discretion by creating federal reporting pressures.
  • Potential burdenCreates privacy risks and potential re-identification concerns from shared defendant-related data.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals worry reporting will coerce harsher prosecutions; conservatives see it as accountability.
Progressive55%

Supports transparency and data to identify disparities and hold offices accountable.

However, worries the federal reporting regime could be used to pressure local prosecutors to pursue harsher prosecutions and roll back reform-minded charging and diversion policies.

Split reaction
Centrist70%

Generally favorable toward standardized reporting as a tool for accountability and evidence-based policy, but cautious about administrative burden, federalism, and potential for misleading statistics without context.

Would seek clear definitions, funding, and contextual data to make reports useful.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely to strongly support the bill as a mechanism to expose and pressure prosecutors perceived as "soft on crime." Views standardized reporting as an appropriate use of Byrne grant leverage to restore tougher prosecution and protect public safety.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Low-cost, limited-scope reporting increases plausibility, but contentious subject and federalism concerns reduce chances, especially in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether noncompliance triggers loss of grant funds or other penalties
  • No cost estimate or funding for DOJ to process and publish data
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals worry reporting will coerce harsher prosecutions; conservatives see it as accountability.

Low-cost, limited-scope reporting increases plausibility, but contentious subject and federalism concerns reduce chances, especially in the…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped reporting mandate that is specific about what data to collect and who must report, but it provides limited implementation scaffolding (no…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis