Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for co…
This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to add tianeptine — including analogues, salts, isomers, and salts of isomers — to Schedule III. The scheduling becomes effective 90 days after enactment.
Progressives worry about criminalization; conservatives emphasize enforcement
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Controlled Substances Act that is mechanistically precise and provides a clear effective date, but it contains limited contextual justification, no fiscal or resourcing discussion, minimal consideration of edge cases (notably undefined "analogues"), and no added reporting or review provisions.
This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to add tianeptine — including analogues, salts, isomers, and salts of isomers — to Schedule III.
The scheduling becomes effective 90 days after enactment.
Content is narrow and administrative so chances are reasonable, but congressional calendaring, possible stakeholder opposition, and procedural hurdles reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Controlled Substances Act that is mechanistically precise and provides a clear effective date, but it contains limited contextual justification, no fiscal or resourcing discussion, minimal consideration of edge cases (notably undefined "analogues"), and no added reporting or review provisions.
Progressives worry about criminalization; conservatives emphasize enforcement
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives worry about criminalization; conservatives emphasize enforcement
Likely supportive of public-health measures that reduce opioid harm, but wary of criminalization and access barriers.
Would emphasize treatment, harm reduction, and protecting research and medical access when implementing scheduling.
Will view this as a pragmatic regulatory response to reports of misuse.
Wants implementation details, fiscal impacts, and guardrails to avoid unintended consequences.
May support action that strengthens law enforcement against opioids, but cautious about expanding federal regulation and costs.
Would push for narrow scope and enforcement focus.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administrative so chances are reasonable, but congressional calendaring, possible stakeholder opposition, and procedural hurdles reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives worry about criminalization; conservatives emphasize enforcement
Content is narrow and administrative so chances are reasonable, but congressional calendaring, possible stakeholder opposition, and procedu…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Controlled Substances Act that is mechanistically precise and provides a clear effective date, but…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.