Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Amends 18 U.S.C. 3486 to allow federal officials to attach 180-day nondisclosure requirements to certain administrative subpoenas when certified harms exist. Creates new 3486A establishing a judicial-review process, standards for issuing and extending gag orders, sealed hearings, permitted narrow disclosures, and procedures for government applications and extensions.
Progressives stress civil liberties and transparency risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modification that is drafted with specific operational mechanisms and judicial procedures.
Amends 18 U.S.C. 3486 to allow federal officials to attach 180-day nondisclosure requirements to certain administrative subpoenas when certified harms exist.
Creates new 3486A establishing a judicial-review process, standards for issuing and extending gag orders, sealed hearings, permitted narrow disclosures, and procedures for government applications and extensions.
Relatively narrow, non‑fiscal, law‑enforcement procedural bill with some civil‑liberties friction; could pass with compromise but not certain.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modification that is drafted with specific operational mechanisms and judicial procedures. It clearly integrates into the relevant section of title 18 and provides concrete standards, timelines, and exceptions for nondisclosure orders and their review.
Progressives stress civil liberties and transparency risks.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives stress civil liberties and transparency risks.
Cautiously supportive of stronger tools to investigate child predators but worried about expanded secrecy and civil liberties.
Values the bill's judicial-review requirement but questions the breadth and ex parte extension powers.
Generally favorable because it strengthens investigative tools while adding judicial review, but wants firm procedural safeguards and timely court rulings.
Sees tradeoffs between effective enforcement and transparency.
Supportive because the bill strengthens law-enforcement capacity to pursue child predators and protect victims.
Generally accepts secrecy provisions as necessary, while expecting prompt judicial backing for operational security.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Relatively narrow, non‑fiscal, law‑enforcement procedural bill with some civil‑liberties friction; could pass with compromise but not certain.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress civil liberties and transparency risks.
Relatively narrow, non‑fiscal, law‑enforcement procedural bill with some civil‑liberties friction; could pass with compromise but not certa…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modification that is drafted with specific operational mechanisms and judicial procedures. It clearly integrates into the relevant section…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.