Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill amends title 4, U.S. Code to require that a funeral honors detail recite a specific "13 Folds of Honor" text when presenting a folded U.S. flag for a deceased service member or veteran. It includes a Sense of Congress dedicating the act to the 13 service members killed at Hamid Karzai International Airport in August 2021.
Religious language: conservatives accept; liberals see government endorsement.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change that prescribes a specific ceremonial requirement and includes a limited opt-out.
This bill amends title 4, U.S. Code to require that a funeral honors detail recite a specific "13 Folds of Honor" text when presenting a folded U.S. flag for a deceased service member or veteran.
It includes a Sense of Congress dedicating the act to the 13 service members killed at Hamid Karzai International Airport in August 2021.
The requirement can be waived if the next of kin or other agent elects not to have the recitation.
Narrow, low-cost, military-honor bill has reasonable chance, but explicit religious content and constitutional sensitivity create meaningful hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change that prescribes a specific ceremonial requirement and includes a limited opt-out. It integrates the new requirement into the U.S. Code and supplies the exact text to be recited.
Religious language: conservatives accept; liberals see government endorsement.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Religious language: conservatives accept; liberals see government endorsement.
Likely supportive of honoring fallen service members but concerned about government promotion of explicitly religious language in official ceremonies.
The next-of-kin opt-out reduces coercion, yet the bill could still raise Establishment Clause and inclusivity worries.
Would prefer a secular option or clearer protections for nonreligious families and service members.
Views the bill as a symbolic, low-cost way to honor the fallen but notes constitutional and practical questions.
The next-of-kin opt-out makes it less coercive; still wants clear implementation guidance and an inclusive alternative to avoid legal exposure.
Overall inclined to support if administrative and constitutional concerns are addressed.
Likely strongly supportive: sees the bill as appropriately patriotic and reverent toward the military, including fitting religious language such as 'In God We Trust.' Views opt-out as respectful but unnecessary for most families.
Considers codifying the recitation a reinforcement of tradition and remembrance.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost, military-honor bill has reasonable chance, but explicit religious content and constitutional sensitivity create meaningful hurdles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Religious language: conservatives accept; liberals see government endorsement.
Narrow, low-cost, military-honor bill has reasonable chance, but explicit religious content and constitutional sensitivity create meaningfu…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change that prescribes a specific ceremonial requirement and includes a limited opt-out. It integrates the new requirement into the U.S. Code…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.