Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
The bill, titled the Remove the Stain Act, would rescind every Medal of Honor awarded for actions at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890, and require the removal of those recipients' names from the official Medal of Honor Rolls. It does not require return of the physical medals and preserves any federal benefits recipients currently hold.
Progressives emphasize moral correction and Tribal requests
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is clear and narrowly focused in purpose and delivers a concise statutory directive to rescind Medals of Honor for a specific date and location and to remove names from the authorized rolls.
The bill, titled the Remove the Stain Act, would rescind every Medal of Honor awarded for actions at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890, and require the removal of those recipients' names from the official Medal of Honor Rolls.
It does not require return of the physical medals and preserves any federal benefits recipients currently hold.
Highly implementable and low-cost but symbolically sensitive; plausible House passage, Senate and final enactment face substantial procedural and coalition challenges.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is clear and narrowly focused in purpose and delivers a concise statutory directive to rescind Medals of Honor for a specific date and location and to remove names from the authorized rolls. It provides limited operational direction beyond identification of the responsible officials and two constraints (no forced return of medals; no denial of benefits).
Progressives emphasize moral correction and Tribal requests
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize moral correction and Tribal requests
This persona would likely view the bill as a corrective, symbolic step addressing a documented atrocity and restoring honor to the Medal of Honor.
They would emphasize historical acknowledgement of the Wounded Knee Massacre and respect Tribal requests documented in the bill.
A centrist would see this as a narrowly focused, symbolic correction that addresses a documented historical injustice but raises questions about precedent and process.
They would weigh the moral rationale against concerns about administrative and legal implications for military awards.
This persona would likely oppose the bill as an inappropriate revision of military honors and a disrespect to servicemembers, even if related to a tragic event.
They would express concern about retroactively judging historical actors and potential negative effects on military tradition and morale.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Highly implementable and low-cost but symbolically sensitive; plausible House passage, Senate and final enactment face substantial procedural and coalition challenges.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize moral correction and Tribal requests
Highly implementable and low-cost but symbolically sensitive; plausible House passage, Senate and final enactment face substantial procedur…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is clear and narrowly focused in purpose and delivers a concise statutory directive to rescind Medals of Honor for a specific date and location and to remove names fr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.