Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill amends the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to submit an annual report to Congress on the status of specified hydropower licensing processes. Reports must cover new and subsequent licenses (under section 15) and original licenses (under section 4(e)) for which an interested party notified FERC at least three years earlier.
Liberals stress environmental and tribal protection risks from rushed reviews
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting requirement that integrates into existing law and provides clear content and timing requirements for the Commission’s annual reports on specified hydropower licensing processes.
The bill amends the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to submit an annual report to Congress on the status of specified hydropower licensing processes.
Reports must cover new and subsequent licenses (under section 15) and original licenses (under section 4(e)) for which an interested party notified FERC at least three years earlier.
Each report must list notice dates, docket numbers, application status, anticipated issuance dates, upcoming proceedings, required actions by stakeholders and agencies, and must disaggregate by license type.
Narrow transparency mandate has favorable legislative history but may stall in Senate committee or be folded into larger measures.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting requirement that integrates into existing law and provides clear content and timing requirements for the Commission’s annual reports on specified hydropower licensing processes.
Liberals stress environmental and tribal protection risks from rushed reviews
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress environmental and tribal protection risks from rushed reviews
Likely to view the bill as a limited transparency measure that could help hold agencies and licensees accountable during relicensing.
Supportive of improved public information, but cautious that reporting alone won’t guarantee environmental or tribal protections or faster, fair reviews.
Will likely see the bill as a sensible, low-cost oversight tool to increase transparency and inform policymaking on hydropower relicensing.
Supportive if reporting does not impose undue administrative burden or alter substantive licensing standards.
Likely to view the bill favorably as modest oversight that can expose permitting delays and support arguments for streamlining hydropower licensing.
Some conservatives may be wary of additional federal reporting mandates but overall see potential to reduce regulatory frictions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow transparency mandate has favorable legislative history but may stall in Senate committee or be folded into larger measures.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress environmental and tribal protection risks from rushed reviews
Narrow transparency mandate has favorable legislative history but may stall in Senate committee or be folded into larger measures.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting requirement that integrates into existing law and provides clear content and timing requirements for the Commission’s annual reports on…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.