Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill authorizes the HHS Secretary, through the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, to award grants to states, territories, tribal governments, and local jurisdictions to establish unarmed mobile crisis response programs that respond to nonviolent 911 calls. Funded programs must dispatch unarmed professional responders in teams, provide de-escalation, screening, referrals, transportation to alternative destinations, coordinate with social services, and remain independent of law enforcement oversight.
Emphasis on non-police mental-health care versus public safety concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory framework for a federal grant program to support unarmed mobile crisis response programs, with useful program definitions, eligible uses, and detailed reporting requirements.
The bill authorizes the HHS Secretary, through the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, to award grants to states, territories, tribal governments, and local jurisdictions to establish unarmed mobile crisis response programs that respond to nonviolent 911 calls.
Funded programs must dispatch unarmed professional responders in teams, provide de-escalation, screening, referrals, transportation to alternative destinations, coordinate with social services, and remain independent of law enforcement oversight.
Grants may be used for hiring, training, 911 system upgrades, coordination with 9-8-8, multilingual services, and data collection; grantees must submit biannual reports to the Secretary, who will report to Congress.
Content is administratively focused and grant-based, aiding passage chances; lack of appropriation, procedural hurdles, and some political sensitivity lower odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory framework for a federal grant program to support unarmed mobile crisis response programs, with useful program definitions, eligible uses, and detailed reporting requirements. Key implementation and fiscal details that are commonly expected for a substantive grant program—authorized funding levels, award and prioritization criteria, timelines, oversight/enforcement mechanisms, and interactions with other federal laws/programs—are largely left to administrative rulemaking or are absent.
Emphasis on non-police mental-health care versus public safety concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Emphasis on non-police mental-health care versus public safety concerns
Likely supportive because the bill funds non-police, trauma-informed responses to mental health, substance use, and homelessness-related 911 calls.
It aligns with reducing criminal legal system involvement, advancing racial equity in emergency response, and expanding community-based care.
Cautious support: the approach is pragmatic—triage nonviolent calls to specialized responders—but requires careful implementation, evaluation, and coordination with existing emergency services.
Favor pilots, measurable outcomes, and safeguards.
Skeptical: while alternatives to ERs may be useful, this federal grant program expands federal involvement in local public safety decisions and limits law enforcement oversight.
Concerned about public safety, accountability, and fiscal cost.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is administratively focused and grant-based, aiding passage chances; lack of appropriation, procedural hurdles, and some political sensitivity lower odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Emphasis on non-police mental-health care versus public safety concerns
Content is administratively focused and grant-based, aiding passage chances; lack of appropriation, procedural hurdles, and some political…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory framework for a federal grant program to support unarmed mobile crisis response programs, with useful program definitions, eligible uses…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.