H.R. 3666 (119th)Bill Overview

To For the relief of Luana S. Cordeiro.

domestic policy|Private Legislation
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for considerati…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This private bill provides Luana S. Cordeiro eligibility to receive an immigrant visa or adjust to lawful permanent resident status, treats any prior unlawful entry as lawful for adjustment purposes if she enters by a two‑year deadline, waives removal/inadmissibility grounds reflected in DHS or State records as of enactment, directs DHS to rescind outstanding removal orders, reduces the immigrant visa total for her birth country by one, and bars her close relatives from receiving immigration preference by virtue of relationship.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize humanitarian relief and stability for the individual

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly drafted private relief measure that clearly specifies statutory waivers, responsible agencies, a filing deadline, and visa accounting adjustments, providing concrete mechanisms for granting permanent resident status to a named individual.

This private bill provides Luana S.

Cordeiro eligibility to receive an immigrant visa or adjust to lawful permanent resident status, treats any prior unlawful entry as lawful for adjustment purposes if she enters by a two‑year deadline, waives removal/inadmissibility grounds reflected in DHS or State records as of enactment, directs DHS to rescind outstanding removal orders, reduces the immigrant visa total for her birth country by one, and bars her close relatives from receiving immigration preference by virtue of relationship.

It also specifies PAYGO budgetary treatment.

Passage30/100

Narrow, low-cost bill improves prospects in committee/House, but Senate procedural hurdles and immigration sensitivities reduce overall chances.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly drafted private relief measure that clearly specifies statutory waivers, responsible agencies, a filing deadline, and visa accounting adjustments, providing concrete mechanisms for granting permanent resident status to a named individual.

Contention68/100

Progressives emphasize humanitarian relief and stability for the individual

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedImmigrants

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitDirectly provides the named individual a pathway to lawful permanent residence and associated benefits.
  • Potential benefitEnables the beneficiary to obtain work authorization and potentially contribute wages and taxes.
  • Potential benefitRescinding removal orders ends immediate deportation risk and stabilizes the individual's immigration status.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates a case-specific exception to immigration statutes, potentially seen as uneven application of law.
  • ImmigrantsReduces the pool of immigrant visas for the beneficiary’s birth country by one, affecting other applicants.
  • Potential burdenWaiving grounds for removal may forgive past inadmissibility or deportation reasons noted in records.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize humanitarian relief and stability for the individual
Progressive80%

Likely supportive overall as targeted relief for an individual facing removal, especially if there are humanitarian or long‑term community ties.

Concerned about the clause blocking family preference but views the bill as a narrow remedy rather than systemic reform.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable to resolving an individual case through a limited private bill, provided procedural safeguards and a clear justification are present.

Sees small administrative and budgetary effects, but worries about precedent and proper vetting.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Likely opposed because it waives statutory inadmissibility and removal grounds and bypasses ordinary immigration processes.

The carve‑out denying relatives' preferences is a modest offset but unlikely to overcome concerns about precedent and rule‑of‑law.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow, low-cost bill improves prospects in committee/House, but Senate procedural hurdles and immigration sensitivities reduce overall chances.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Contents of DHS/State Dept. records about the beneficiary
  • Absence of a cost estimate in the bill text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize humanitarian relief and stability for the individual

Narrow, low-cost bill improves prospects in committee/House, but Senate procedural hurdles and immigration sensitivities reduce overall cha…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly drafted private relief measure that clearly specifies statutory waivers, responsible agencies, a filing deadline, and visa accounting adjustments, provi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis