H.R. 3671 (119th)Bill Overview

To designate the Federal building located at 300 West Congress Street in Tucson, Arizona, as the "Raúl M. Grijalva Federal Building".

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill names the Federal building at 300 West Congress Street in Tucson, Arizona, the “Raúl M. Grijalva Federal Building.” It also treats any existing references to the building as referring to that new name.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize honoring public service; conservatives stress politicization.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative designation that precisely names the building and includes a functional references clause.

This bill names the Federal building at 300 West Congress Street in Tucson, Arizona, the “Raúl M.

Grijalva Federal Building.” It also treats any existing references to the building as referring to that new name.

Passage65/100

Narrow, low-cost naming bills often succeed, though naming a building for a political figure can attract objections and delay in the Senate.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative designation that precisely names the building and includes a functional references clause. It lacks explanatory findings, administrative implementation details, and any mention of costs, but those absences are typical and not critical for achieving the narrow objective of renaming a federal building.

Contention55/100

Progressives emphasize honoring public service; conservatives stress politicization.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Communities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitOfficially recognizes and honors the public service of Raúl M. Grijalva.
  • Local governmentsReinforces local civic pride and historic recognition in Tucson.
  • Federal agenciesClarifies legal and administrative references to the building across federal records.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesImposes minor federal costs for new signage, plaques, and administrative updates.
  • CommunitiesCould provoke community disagreement over honoring a particular public figure.
  • Potential burdenCreates administrative burden to update maps, databases, and legal documents.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize honoring public service; conservatives stress politicization.
Progressive90%

Likely supportive.

The bill recognizes a longtime Tucson representative and public servant by naming a federal building for him.

Supporters will view the designation as appropriate local recognition without policy consequences.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious.

As a straightforward naming measure, it is low-stakes, but centrists will look for bipartisan support and minimal fiscal impact.

They may ask for consultation with local officials.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Likely skeptical or opposed.

Conservatives may object to naming federal property after a living, partisan Member of Congress and view this as politicization and misuse of federal symbolism.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, low-cost naming bills often succeed, though naming a building for a political figure can attract objections and delay in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the namesake is a current officeholder and related objections
  • Local constituency support or organized opposition
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize honoring public service; conservatives stress politicization.

Narrow, low-cost naming bills often succeed, though naming a building for a political figure can attract objections and delay in the Senate.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative designation that precisely names the building and includes a functional references clause. It lacks explanatory findings, administrative im…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis