H.R. 3692 (119th)Bill Overview

To reauthorize the Young Fishermen's Development Act.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Employment and training programsMarine and coastal resources, fisheries
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Jun 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 308.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends Section 5(a) of the Young Fishermen’s Development Act to extend its authorization period, replacing the current year (2026) with 2031. In effect, it reauthorizes the Act and its programs for an additional five years.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes workforce, equity, and continuation benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative reauthorization that correctly identifies the statutory target but provides only minimal statutory text and no fiscal, transitional, or accountability details in the provided excerpt.

This bill amends Section 5(a) of the Young Fishermen’s Development Act to extend its authorization period, replacing the current year (2026) with 2031.

In effect, it reauthorizes the Act and its programs for an additional five years.

Passage80/100

Very narrow, low-controversy reauthorization with few policy changes makes enactment likely absent procedural obstacles.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative reauthorization that correctly identifies the statutory target but provides only minimal statutory text and no fiscal, transitional, or accountability details in the provided excerpt.

Contention25/100

Left emphasizes workforce, equity, and continuation benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Small businessesFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesContinues federal grant eligibility for training, mentorship, and business assistance for young commercial fishermen.
  • Potential benefitProvides multi-year policy certainty helping training providers and communities plan workforce development activities.
  • Small businessesMay support retention and modest growth of jobs in coastal fishing and related small businesses.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates an ongoing authorization that could lead to additional federal spending if appropriated.
  • Potential burdenMay perpetuate grant programs without new accountability or measurable performance improvements.
  • Local governmentsCould overlap or duplicate similar state or local workforce programs, complicating coordination.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes workforce, equity, and continuation benefits
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because it preserves funding and programs that train and support young, often coastal, fishing workers.

Views this as workforce development that can aid small-scale fishers and coastal communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable as a narrow, targeted reauthorization with limited scope and bipartisan sponsorship.

Wants assurance of fiscal prudence, measurable outcomes, and oversight.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously open but skeptical; supports local fisheries but wary of extending federal programs without tighter limits.

Concerns focus on federal spending and program expansion.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Very narrow, low-controversy reauthorization with few policy changes makes enactment likely absent procedural obstacles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No appropriation amounts or cost estimate included
  • Possible Senate holds or amendment requests
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes workforce, equity, and continuation benefits

Very narrow, low-controversy reauthorization with few policy changes makes enactment likely absent procedural obstacles.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative reauthorization that correctly identifies the statutory target but provides only minimal statutory text and no fiscal, transitiona…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis