Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Requires HUD to create an Urban Heat Mitigation and Management Grant Program, coordinated with EPA, USDA Forest Service, and NOAA. Grants fund projects that reduce urban heat (tree planting, cool roofs/pavements, cooling centers, education, urban forestry plans) with at least 75% of funds targeted to high-poverty census tracts.
Progressives emphasize environmental justice and direct benefits to redlined tracts
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a well-defined federal grant program to mitigate excess urban heat with clear statutory authorities, eligible activities, prioritized beneficiaries, and an appropriation authorization, while delegating routine implementation details to the Secretary and agency guidance.
Requires HUD to create an Urban Heat Mitigation and Management Grant Program, coordinated with EPA, USDA Forest Service, and NOAA.
Grants fund projects that reduce urban heat (tree planting, cool roofs/pavements, cooling centers, education, urban forestry plans) with at least 75% of funds targeted to high-poverty census tracts.
The program allows up to 80 percent federal cost share (waivable to 100% for hardship), limits technical assistance to 3% and oversight to 5% of appropriations, and authorizes $30 million per year for FY2026–2033.
Program is narrowly scoped, modestly funded, and administratively viable, but requires appropriations and faces procedural hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a well-defined federal grant program to mitigate excess urban heat with clear statutory authorities, eligible activities, prioritized beneficiaries, and an appropriation authorization, while delegating routine implementation details to the Secretary and agency guidance.
Progressives emphasize environmental justice and direct benefits to redlined tracts
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize environmental justice and direct benefits to redlined tracts
Generally supportive; sees the bill as a targeted environmental-justice and public-health investment directing resources to low-income and redlined communities.
Would welcome the emphasis on tree canopy, cooling centers, and community engagement but view funding levels and long-term maintenance provisions as potentially inadequate.
Supportive but pragmatic; views the bill as a reasonable targeted federal investment to reduce heat risk in vulnerable areas.
Would seek clearer metrics, coordination with existing programs, and efficient administration to avoid duplication and ensure measurable results.
Skeptical; may support localized tree planting or shade infrastructure but reluctant about a new HUD-centered federal grant program.
Concerns will focus on federal spending, bureaucracy, and preferring state or local solutions over federal grant-making.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Program is narrowly scoped, modestly funded, and administratively viable, but requires appropriations and faces procedural hurdles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize environmental justice and direct benefits to redlined tracts
Program is narrowly scoped, modestly funded, and administratively viable, but requires appropriations and faces procedural hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a well-defined federal grant program to mitigate excess urban heat with clear statutory authorities, eligible activities, prioritized beneficiaries, and a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.