H.R. 3709 (119th)Bill Overview

Advancing the Mentor-Protégé Program for Small Financial Institutions Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Corporate finance and managementEmployment and training programs
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jun 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 168.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Establishes a Financial Agent Mentor‑Protégé Program at the Treasury under FIRREA Section 308. Designated financial agents or large financial institutions may mentor small, minority, or rural financial institutions to prepare them to serve as government financial agents or improve services.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes benefits for minority and rural depository institutions

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear statutory authority for a Financial Agent Mentor‑Protégé Program, supplies definitions and a reporting hook into an existing statutory report, and assigns responsibility to the Secretary of the Treasury, but it defers most operational, fiscal, and performance details to subordinate guidance or regulation.

Establishes a Financial Agent Mentor‑Protégé Program at the Treasury under FIRREA Section 308.

Designated financial agents or large financial institutions may mentor small, minority, or rural financial institutions to prepare them to serve as government financial agents or improve services.

Requires annual outreach, an exclusion process, and reporting via the Treasury Office of Minority and Women Inclusion.

Passage65/100

Content is narrow, administratively focused, low cost, and politically unobjectionable—favorable for enactment absent competing priorities.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear statutory authority for a Financial Agent Mentor‑Protégé Program, supplies definitions and a reporting hook into an existing statutory report, and assigns responsibility to the Secretary of the Treasury, but it defers most operational, fiscal, and performance details to subordinate guidance or regulation.

Contention55/100

Liberal emphasizes benefits for minority and rural depository institutions

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Cities · Federal agenciesCommunities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CitiesIncreases small institutions' capacity to serve as government financial agents through technical mentorship.
  • Federal agenciesExpands opportunities for minority and rural depository institutions to access federal contracting readiness help.
  • Potential benefitMay improve customer services at small institutions via operational and compliance capability building.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates administrative burden and potential costs for Treasury to implement and oversee the Program.
  • Potential burdenMay impose additional compliance or resource burdens on mentor institutions providing assistance.
  • CommunitiesAsset thresholds and definitions could exclude some community banks and produce eligibility disputes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes benefits for minority and rural depository institutions
Progressive85%

Likely supportive because the program targets small, minority, and rural depository institutions and builds institutional capacity.

Concerned about program design details, potential large‑bank capture, and whether reporting will measure real outcomes beyond participation counts.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable to capacity‑building and voluntary mentorship, while cautious about implementation, costs, and measurable results.

Wants clear regulations, an exclusion process that limits risk, and evaluation mechanisms to ensure the program is effective and fiscally prudent.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Skeptical about expanding federal programs and potential government involvement in coordinating private bank relationships.

May accept the bill if strictly voluntary with minimal new regulatory burdens, but worries about favoritism, selection bias, and expanded Treasury oversight.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Content is narrow, administratively focused, low cost, and politically unobjectionable—favorable for enactment absent competing priorities.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No congressional cost estimate or appropriation language included
  • Extent of Treasury rulemaking and implementation resources needed
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes benefits for minority and rural depository institutions

Content is narrow, administratively focused, low cost, and politically unobjectionable—favorable for enactment absent competing priorities.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear statutory authority for a Financial Agent Mentor‑Protégé Program, supplies definitions and a reporting hook into an existing statutory report, and a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis