H.R. 3713 (119th)Bill Overview

Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2025

Environmental Protection|Advanced technology and technological innovationsCongressional oversight
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Creates an Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains within EPA to coordinate legacy hardrock and uranium mine cleanup. The Office will set priorities, share best practices, support Tribal consultation, produce a Navajo Nation 10-year interagency plan, and provide technical assistance.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and Navajo plan urgency

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly described administrative entity within EPA with defined coordination, planning, and reporting duties and reasonable statutory links to existing law, but it leaves significant implementation and resourcing details unspecified.

Creates an Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains within EPA to coordinate legacy hardrock and uranium mine cleanup.

The Office will set priorities, share best practices, support Tribal consultation, produce a Navajo Nation 10-year interagency plan, and provide technical assistance.

The Office must annually publish a prioritized mine list and report to Congressional committees.

Passage40/100

Technocratic, narrowly focused reform with built-in consultation lowers ideological barriers, but requires appropriations and Senate consensus which reduce near-term odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly described administrative entity within EPA with defined coordination, planning, and reporting duties and reasonable statutory links to existing law, but it leaves significant implementation and resourcing details unspecified.

Contention60/100

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and Navajo plan urgency

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesImproved federal coordination could accelerate cleanup timelines for contaminated legacy mine sites.
  • Potential benefitAdoption of best practices and innovative technologies could reduce human health and environmental risks from contamina…
  • Potential benefitIncreased remediation activity could create jobs in environmental assessment, construction, and monitoring in affected…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreation of a new Office will increase EPA administrative costs and require additional funding.
  • Potential burdenA new coordination layer could duplicate Regional Office roles and add bureaucratic steps, potentially delaying actions.
  • Potential burdenRequired reports and planning obligations may exceed existing budgets absent new appropriations, imposing fiscal pressu…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and Navajo plan urgency
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill focuses federal coordination, Tribal consultation, and a targeted plan for Navajo Nation uranium sites.

Wants stronger funding and enforcement guarantees to ensure timely cleanup and community involvement.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable to improved coordination and clearer planning, especially for Navajo uranium sites, while cautious about cost, duplication, and measurable outcomes.

Will look for clear funding, performance metrics, and Congressional oversight.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical of creating a new EPA office that could expand bureaucracy and federal involvement in state and Tribal matters.

Notes the bill does not add regulatory authority, but is concerned about increased costs and potential liability impacts on mining interests.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technocratic, narrowly focused reform with built-in consultation lowers ideological barriers, but requires appropriations and Senate consensus which reduce near-term odds.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No explicit appropriation or staffing authorization included
  • Potential opposition over liability and Good Samaritan protections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and Navajo plan urgency

Technocratic, narrowly focused reform with built-in consultation lowers ideological barriers, but requires appropriations and Senate consen…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly described administrative entity within EPA with defined coordination, planning, and reporting duties and reasonable statutory links to existing…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis