H.R. 3716 (119th)Bill Overview

Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Banking and financial institutions regulationCongressional oversight
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jun 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 169.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require additional reporting and reviews when the FDIC (or other agencies) invokes the systemic risk exception to wind up a failed insured depository institution. It directs the Government Accountability Office to produce a review within 60 days and again 180 days after such a determination, and requires the appropriate federal banking agency to deliver detailed reports to Congress within 90 days and again 210 days.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize accountability and prevention of future bailouts

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require timely GAO reviews and agency reports with detailed content and procedural safeguards, but it omits any discussion of fiscal or resource implications for executing the new reporting obligations.

The bill amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require additional reporting and reviews when the FDIC (or other agencies) invokes the systemic risk exception to wind up a failed insured depository institution.

It directs the Government Accountability Office to produce a review within 60 days and again 180 days after such a determination, and requires the appropriate federal banking agency to deliver detailed reports to Congress within 90 days and again 210 days.

Reports must cover basis for the determination, mismanagement, supervisory shortcomings, related regulator actions, and other contributing entities; agencies must publish materials to the fullest extent practicable while preserving legal privileges and may consult Congressional committee leaders before omitting materials.

Passage45/100

Administrative transparency bill has plausible bipartisan appeal, but agency/industry pushback and Senate procedural obstacles lower overall odds.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require timely GAO reviews and agency reports with detailed content and procedural safeguards, but it omits any discussion of fiscal or resource implications for executing the new reporting obligations.

Contention55/100

Progressives emphasize accountability and prevention of future bailouts

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases transparency about why systemic risk authority was used in particular bank failures.
  • Federal agenciesCreates detailed, time‑bound GAO and agency reports to inform congressional oversight and policy reforms.
  • Potential benefitCan identify supervisory shortcomings and lead to regulatory or legislative recommendations to reduce future failures.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases administrative and reporting burdens on federal banking agencies and GAO, raising operational costs.
  • Potential burdenPublishing detailed supervisory materials risks exposing sensitive information that could harm market confidence or com…
  • Potential burdenMandatory reports and consultations could slow rapid crisis responses or complicate emergency resolution timelines.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize accountability and prevention of future bailouts
Progressive85%

Likely supportive: sees the bill as improving accountability and transparency around public interventions for failed banks.

Would view GAO and agency reports as tools to expose mismanagement, regulatory failures, and to inform reforms preventing future bailouts.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Cautiously supportive: values increased oversight and structured timelines but worries about operational burdens and preserving crisis management flexibility.

Sees the bill as a reasonable balance between transparency and protecting privileged supervisory information.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Skeptical or somewhat opposed: values transparency in principle but worries this imposes new constraints on regulators, risks politicizing crisis responses, and may harm market confidence.

Concerned about disclosure of privileged supervisory materials and added administrative burdens.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Administrative transparency bill has plausible bipartisan appeal, but agency/industry pushback and Senate procedural obstacles lower overall odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Strength of regulator and industry opposition
  • Absent cost estimates and administrative burden quantification
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize accountability and prevention of future bailouts

Administrative transparency bill has plausible bipartisan appeal, but agency/industry pushback and Senate procedural obstacles lower overal…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require timely GAO reviews and agency reports with detailed content and procedu…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis