Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Adds a new section to the Stafford Act authorizing FEMA (through the Regional Administrator) to provide grants, equipment, supplies, and personnel to State and local governments for mitigation and management of extreme heat events. Requires FEMA to coordinate with NOAA, sets eligibility documentation requirements (loss of life, revenue, other assistance, long-term impacts), allows use of existing Stafford Act authorities (section 403 and hazard mitigation under section 404) whether or not a major disaster is declared, and mandates rules, appeals, and eligible cost definitions.
Left emphasizes life-saving and climate adaptation benefits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory authority within the Stafford Act to provide federal assistance for extreme heat events and sets basic coordination and rulemaking obligations, but it leaves key implementation, funding, and accountability details to regulation or future appropriations.
Adds a new section to the Stafford Act authorizing FEMA (through the Regional Administrator) to provide grants, equipment, supplies, and personnel to State and local governments for mitigation and management of extreme heat events.
Requires FEMA to coordinate with NOAA, sets eligibility documentation requirements (loss of life, revenue, other assistance, long-term impacts), allows use of existing Stafford Act authorities (section 403 and hazard mitigation under section 404) whether or not a major disaster is declared, and mandates rules, appeals, and eligible cost definitions.
Directs FEMA, NOAA, and CDC to develop an objective temperature-and-duration threshold for qualifying extreme heat events within 90 days of enactment.
Technocratic, narrow adaptation measure improves prospects, but unspecified funding and expansion of FEMA authority moderate chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory authority within the Stafford Act to provide federal assistance for extreme heat events and sets basic coordination and rulemaking obligations, but it leaves key implementation, funding, and accountability details to regulation or future appropriations.
Left emphasizes life-saving and climate adaptation benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes life-saving and climate adaptation benefits.
Generally supportive; views the bill as a necessary federal response to a worsening climate-driven hazard that endangers public health.
Sees federal grants and coordination with NOAA/CDC as appropriate steps to protect vulnerable communities.
Cautiously supportive as a pragmatic adaptation measure, but concerned about costs, administrative complexity, and overlapping programs.
Wants clear rules and fiscal transparency before full endorsement.
Skeptical; sees the bill as expanding federal emergency powers and spending for a hazard traditionally handled locally.
Concerned about new bureaucracy, costs, and discretionary aid decisions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow adaptation measure improves prospects, but unspecified funding and expansion of FEMA authority moderate chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes life-saving and climate adaptation benefits.
Technocratic, narrow adaptation measure improves prospects, but unspecified funding and expansion of FEMA authority moderate chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory authority within the Stafford Act to provide federal assistance for extreme heat events and sets basic coordination and rulemaking oblig…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.