H.R. 3747 (119th)Bill Overview

AADAPT Act

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jun 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize and modify the Project ECHO grant program and to create a specific grant stream for technology-enabled collaborative training to improve Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia diagnosis and care. It defines eligible entities and health care professionals, requires applicant plans to assess effects on patients and providers, mandates reporting to the Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s Research, Care, and Services, directs the Secretary to submit an updated report within four years, and authorizes appropriations: $10,000,000 annually (FY2022–2032) for the program generally and $1,000,000 annually (FY2027–2032) for the Alzheimer’s/dementia grants.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize access, equity, and workforce benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly authorizes and modifies statutory grant authority to expand Project ECHO activity to Alzheimer’s and related dementia care, provides explicit appropriation authorizations for the program streams, and embeds reporting requirements.

This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize and modify the Project ECHO grant program and to create a specific grant stream for technology-enabled collaborative training to improve Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia diagnosis and care.

It defines eligible entities and health care professionals, requires applicant plans to assess effects on patients and providers, mandates reporting to the Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s Research, Care, and Services, directs the Secretary to submit an updated report within four years, and authorizes appropriations: $10,000,000 annually (FY2022–2032) for the program generally and $1,000,000 annually (FY2027–2032) for the Alzheimer’s/dementia grants.

Passage45/100

Technocratic, low-cost grant reauthorization with narrow scope increases chances, but enactment depends on committee action and future appropriations.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly authorizes and modifies statutory grant authority to expand Project ECHO activity to Alzheimer’s and related dementia care, provides explicit appropriation authorizations for the program streams, and embeds reporting requirements. It amends the relevant section of the Public Health Service Act in a targeted manner.

Contention55/100

Liberals emphasize access, equity, and workforce benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Cities · WorkersLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CitiesExpands training and clinical support capacity for primary care clinicians in underserved and rural areas.
  • Potential benefitMay increase early and accurate diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s and related dementias.
  • WorkersPromotes use of technology-enabled collaborative learning models like tele-mentoring and virtual case review.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenDementia-specific funding is modest relative to estimated national needs for dementia care services.
  • Potential burdenGrant application, evaluation, and reporting requirements increase administrative burden for applicants and grantees.
  • Potential burdenDementia grant funds do not become available until FY2027, delaying immediate program expansion.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize access, equity, and workforce benefits
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because the bill targets underserved communities and aims to expand provider capacity for dementia care.

It uses technology-enabled training to improve early diagnosis and retention of providers in rural and medically underserved areas.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: the bill targets a real workforce and access problem with modest federal investment and measurable reporting.

Support will hinge on clarity of outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Cautiously skeptical: supports improving dementia care access, but wary of expanding federal grant programs and added bureaucracy.

Concerned about new federal spending and potential duplication with state or private initiatives.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, low-cost grant reauthorization with narrow scope increases chances, but enactment depends on committee action and future appropriations.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate included in text
  • Whether appropriators will fund authorized amounts
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize access, equity, and workforce benefits

Technocratic, low-cost grant reauthorization with narrow scope increases chances, but enactment depends on committee action and future appr…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly authorizes and modifies statutory grant authority to expand Project ECHO activity to Alzheimer’s and related dementia care, provides explicit appropriation au…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis